Paul Cancalon
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- John S. ElamWilbur WidmerDavid J. GreenblattMichael J. HanleyLloyd M. BeidlerJack D. KlingmanCharles R. BryanGary Williamson
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers)Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers)Plant chemical constituents analysis (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Paul Cancalon
45 papers receiving 993 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 289
- Molecular Biology 225
- Sensory Systems 174
- Cell Biology 119
- Nutrition and Dietetics 118
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Cancalon
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Cancalon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Cancalon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Cancalon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Cancalon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Cancalon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Cancalon. The network helps show where Paul Cancalon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Cancalon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Cancalon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Cancalon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Cancalon. Paul Cancalon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | New grapefruit and pummelo cultivars with very low furanocoumarin contents are good candidates to provide a solution to the drug interaction problem | 0 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 150 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Paul Cancalon
Paul Cancalon is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Developmental Neuroscience and Horticulture, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers) and Plant chemical constituents analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (174 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (109 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (289 citations). Paul Cancalon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John S. Elam, Wilbur Widmer, David J. Greenblatt, Michael J. Hanley, Lloyd M. Beidler, Jack D. Klingman, Charles R. Bryan, Gary Williamson, Asimina Kerimi and Frederick G. Gmitter. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Brain Research and Journal of Neurochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.