Fred Janssen

1.3k total citations
52 papers, 897 citations indexed

About

Fred Janssen is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Fred Janssen has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 897 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Education, 23 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Fred Janssen's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (19 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (11 papers). Fred Janssen is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (19 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (11 papers). Fred Janssen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Fred Janssen's co-authors include Hanna Westbroek, Jan van Driel, Walter Doyle, A.G. de Kok, Elizabeth A. Davis, Pam Grossman, Dineke E.H. Tigelaar, R.M.J. Heuts, William R. Veal and Arjan de Graaf and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Journal of Operational Research and International Journal of Production Economics.

In The Last Decade

Fred Janssen

52 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fred Janssen Netherlands 16 654 259 72 70 64 52 897
Scott McDonald United States 16 610 0.9× 233 0.9× 20 0.3× 82 1.2× 51 0.8× 71 794
John Wedman United States 14 510 0.8× 203 0.8× 22 0.3× 62 0.9× 104 1.6× 53 910
Gregory Light United States 18 705 1.1× 206 0.8× 11 0.2× 45 0.6× 67 1.0× 31 1.1k
Alexander J. Romiszowski United States 11 466 0.7× 245 0.9× 24 0.3× 86 1.2× 51 0.8× 37 826
Jennifer M. Brill United States 9 279 0.4× 90 0.3× 22 0.3× 70 1.0× 121 1.9× 15 557
Karen A. Schriver United States 10 375 0.6× 239 0.9× 15 0.2× 69 1.0× 57 0.9× 18 1.0k
Lisa McNair United States 14 407 0.6× 104 0.4× 10 0.1× 59 0.8× 94 1.5× 115 1.0k
Timo Lainema Finland 12 168 0.3× 463 1.8× 54 0.8× 137 2.0× 74 1.2× 33 756
Kent Gustafson United States 10 559 0.9× 214 0.8× 15 0.2× 63 0.9× 29 0.5× 40 902
Lorraine Sherry United States 13 514 0.8× 221 0.9× 10 0.1× 82 1.2× 45 0.7× 32 776

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Janssen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Janssen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Janssen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Janssen. The network helps show where Fred Janssen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Janssen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Janssen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Janssen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Janssen. Fred Janssen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Janssen, Fred, et al.. (2024). Improving self‐regulated learning of speaking skills in foreign languages. Modern Language Journal. 108(3). 601–624. 2 indexed citations
2.
Westbroek, Hanna, et al.. (2024). A novel approach for mapping and fostering teacher agency: a multiple case study in the context of higher education. Professional Development in Education. 51(6). 1162–1183. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kuijpers, A., et al.. (2024). A systems thinking approach to capture the complexity of effective routes to teaching. European Journal of Education. 59(2). 1 indexed citations
4.
Kuijpers, A., et al.. (2023). A Perspective for Structure–Property Reasoning to Explicate and Scaffold Thinking like a Chemist. Research in Science Education. 54(2). 283–297. 1 indexed citations
5.
Juurlink, Ludo B. F., et al.. (2022). How to Assess Students’ Structure–Property Reasoning?. Journal of Chemical Education. 99(10). 3396–3405. 8 indexed citations
6.
Oostdam, Ron, et al.. (2021). From speck to story: relating history of mathematics to the cognitive demand level of tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 110(1). 49–64. 10 indexed citations
7.
Schooten, Erik van, et al.. (2021). Hoe zien de alinea’s van onze leerlingen eruit?. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 43(3). 291–321. 1 indexed citations
8.
Westbroek, Hanna, et al.. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education. 42(6). 955–976. 28 indexed citations
9.
Janssen, Fred, et al.. (2020). Promoting insight into algebraic formulas through graphing by hand. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 23(2). 125–144. 6 indexed citations
10.
Westbroek, Hanna, et al.. (2020). Scientific Perspectivism in Secondary-School Chemistry Education. Science & Education. 29(5). 1361–1388. 15 indexed citations
11.
Graaf, Arjan de, Hanna Westbroek, & Fred Janssen. (2018). A Practical Approach to Differentiated Instruction: How Biology Teachers Redesigned Their Genetics and Ecology Lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 30(1). 6–23. 21 indexed citations
12.
Janssen, Fred, et al.. (2017). Attention to Intentions—How to Stimulate Strong Intentions to Change. Research in Science Education. 48(2). 369–387. 7 indexed citations
13.
Janssen, Fred, et al.. (2017). Graphing formulas: Unraveling experts’ recognition processes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 45. 167–182. 2 indexed citations
14.
Janssen, Fred, et al.. (2016). Using an Attribution Support Tool to Enhance the Teacher Efficacy of Student Science Teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 27(3). 303–324. 13 indexed citations
15.
Janssen, Fred, et al.. (2015). Identifying a framework for graphing formulas from expert strategies. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 39. 121–134. 7 indexed citations
16.
Janssen, Fred, Hanna Westbroek, William R. Doyle, & Jan van Driel. (2013). How to make innovation practical. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 115(7). 1–43. 3 indexed citations
17.
Janssen, Fred. (2013). Ontwikkelen van adaptieve onderwijsexpertise: Het belang van gereedschap voor framing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 90(6). 37–41. 1 indexed citations
18.
Aegerter‐Wilmsen, Tinri, et al.. (2006). Introducing Molecular Life Science Students to Model Building Using Computer Simulations.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 25(2). 101–122. 3 indexed citations
19.
Aegerter‐Wilmsen, Tinri, et al.. (2005). Digital learning material for student‐directed model building in molecular biologyS. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 33(5). 325–329. 3 indexed citations
20.
Janssen, Fred, R.M.J. Heuts, & A.G. de Kok. (1998). On the (R, s, Q) inventory model when demand is modelled as a compound Bernoulli process. European Journal of Operational Research. 104(3). 423–436. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026