Florac De Bruyn
About
In The Last Decade
Florac De Bruyn
7 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Pharmacology 350
- Food Science 284
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 140
- Plant Science 81
- Biotechnology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Florac De Bruyn
This map shows the geographic impact of Florac De Bruyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Florac De Bruyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florac De Bruyn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Florac De Bruyn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Florac De Bruyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Florac De Bruyn. The network helps show where Florac De Bruyn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Florac De Bruyn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Florac De Bruyn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Florac De Bruyn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Florac De Bruyn. Florac De Bruyn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 206 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.