Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Wartella
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Wartella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Wartella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Wartella more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Wartella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Wartella. The network helps show where Ellen Wartella may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen Wartella
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen Wartella.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen Wartella based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen Wartella. Ellen Wartella is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Flynn, Rachel M., Rebekah A. Richert, & Ellen Wartella. (2019). Play in a Digital World: How Interactive Digital Games Shape the Lives of Children.. 12(1). 54–73.16 indexed citations
Wartella, Ellen. (2012). The Influence of Media on Young Children's Development.. Zero to three. 32(3). 18–21.1 indexed citations
9.
Richert, Rebekah A., et al.. (2010). Word Learning From Baby Videos. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 164(5). 432–7.59 indexed citations
10.
Whitney, D. Charles, Ellen Wartella, & Dale Kunkel. (2008). Non-academic audiences for content analysis research. OAKTRUST (Texas A&M University). 233–245.1 indexed citations
11.
Wartella, Ellen, et al.. (2004). Raising a world-wise child and the power of media: The impact of television on children's intercultural knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan. 86(3). 222–224.5 indexed citations
Wartella, Ellen. (1995). The Commercialization of Youth: Channel One in Context. Phi Delta Kappan. 76(6). 448–451.10 indexed citations
16.
Wartella, Ellen & Byron Reeves. (1983). Recurring issues in research on children and media. Educational Technology archive. 23. 5–9.16 indexed citations
17.
Wartella, Ellen. (1982). Changing Conceptual Views of Children's Consumer Information Processing. ACR North American Advances.9 indexed citations
18.
Wartella, Ellen. (1979). Children communicating : media and development of thought, speech, understanding. SAGE Publications eBooks.86 indexed citations
19.
Wartella, Ellen, Daniel B. Wackman, & Scott Ward. (1978). Children's Consumer Information Processing: Representation of Information From Television Advertisements. ACR North American Advances.5 indexed citations
20.
Ward, Scott, Daniel B. Wackman, & Ellen Wartella. (1977). The Development of Consumer Information-Processing Skills: Integrating Cognitive Development and Family Interaction Theories. ACR North American Advances.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.