Elizabeth M. King

8.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
96 papers, 5.2k citations indexed

About

Elizabeth M. King is a scholar working on Safety Research, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth M. King has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 5.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Safety Research, 30 papers in Education and 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth M. King's work include Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (30 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (15 papers) and School Choice and Performance (13 papers). Elizabeth M. King is often cited by papers focused on Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (30 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (15 papers) and School Choice and Performance (13 papers). Elizabeth M. King collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Elizabeth M. King's co-authors include M. Anne Hill, John W. Valley, Arthur Mason, Paul Glewwe, Hanan G. Jacoby, William H. Peck, Cynthia B. Lloyd, Michael Kremer, Eric Bettinger and Joshua D. Angrist and has published in prestigious journals such as American Economic Review, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Geology.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth M. King

82 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

4.4 billion years of crus... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2005 2001 2002 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth M. King United States 27 1.7k 1.6k 1.2k 931 811 96 5.2k
Richard Black United Kingdom 40 1.7k 1.0× 123 0.1× 4.4k 3.8× 112 0.1× 45 0.1× 145 7.3k
Robert Raeside United Kingdom 29 563 0.3× 53 0.0× 279 0.2× 192 0.2× 84 0.1× 136 2.3k
William E. Hanson United States 18 88 0.1× 194 0.1× 729 0.6× 688 0.7× 120 0.1× 45 4.0k
Michael T. Ewing Australia 49 1.2k 0.7× 105 0.1× 2.0k 1.8× 119 0.1× 322 0.4× 209 8.0k
Jean M. Johnson United States 13 460 0.3× 196 0.1× 234 0.2× 330 0.4× 77 0.1× 27 1.8k
Jocalyn Clark United States 40 66 0.0× 149 0.1× 2.4k 2.1× 147 0.2× 360 0.4× 208 5.8k
Robert Schoen United States 38 114 0.1× 74 0.0× 2.1k 1.8× 116 0.1× 1.8k 2.2× 144 4.9k
Michael C. Jackson United Kingdom 35 670 0.4× 52 0.0× 1.7k 1.5× 172 0.2× 51 0.1× 145 6.1k
Michael Gallagher United Kingdom 38 21 0.0× 303 0.2× 2.1k 1.8× 648 0.7× 378 0.5× 137 5.1k
David J. Harding United States 29 28 0.0× 195 0.1× 2.9k 2.5× 746 0.8× 217 0.3× 80 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth M. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth M. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth M. King. The network helps show where Elizabeth M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth M. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth M. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth M. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth M. King. Elizabeth M. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Quigley, Cassie, et al.. (2020). STEAM Designed and Enacted: Understanding the Process of Design and Implementation of STEAM Curriculum in an Elementary School. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 29(4). 499–518. 40 indexed citations
2.
King, Elizabeth M., et al.. (2018). Toward Data-Driven Education Systems: More Data and More Evidence Use. 5–34.
3.
Dang, Hai‐Anh & Elizabeth M. King. (2016). Incentives and teacher effort. Economics of Transition. 24(4). 621–660. 2 indexed citations
4.
King, Elizabeth M., et al.. (2015). Promotion with and without Learning: Effects on Student Enrollment and Dropout Behavior. The World Bank Economic Review. 30(3). 580–602. 11 indexed citations
5.
Herro, Danielle, et al.. (2013). Building Comprehensive Digital Media and Learning Programs with Teachers. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2013(1). 1336–1340.
6.
Dang, Hai‐Anh & Elizabeth M. King. (2013). Incentives and Teacher Effort: Further Evidence from a Developing Country. SSRN Electronic Journal. 103(1). e14–e21. 1 indexed citations
7.
King, Elizabeth M., et al.. (2012). The Impact of Early Childhood Nutritional Status on Cognitive Development. The World Bank Economic Review. 5 indexed citations
8.
Banerjee, Ritwik, et al.. (2012). Student and teacher attendance: The role of shared goods in reducing absenteeism. Economics of Education Review. 31(5). 563–574. 22 indexed citations
9.
Steinkuehler, Constance, et al.. (2010). Using a designed, online games based affinity space as a quasi-natural ethnographic context and experiment lab. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 330–331.
10.
Steinkuehler, Constance, Catherine Compton‐Lilly, & Elizabeth M. King. (2010). Reading in the context of online games. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 222–229. 23 indexed citations
11.
King, Elizabeth M.. (2010). Exploring intersections between online and offline affinity space participation. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 486–487.
12.
Lomborg, Bjørn, Bjørn Lomborg, Bjørn Lomborg, et al.. (2009). Global Crises, Global Solutions. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 23 indexed citations
13.
Vervoort, J. D., Reed S. Lewis, John W. Valley, et al.. (2008). Coupled Hf-O isotopic perspective on 50 million years of magmatism in the Idaho batholith. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008. 2 indexed citations
14.
Gultiano, Socorro & Elizabeth M. King. (2007). A Better Start in Life: Evaluation Results from an Early Childhood Development Program. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations
15.
Behrman, Jere R., et al.. (2006). Early Childhood Development through an Integrated Program: Evidence from the Philippines. Impact Evaluation Series No. 2. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3922-IE.. World Bank Publications. 5 indexed citations
16.
Valley, John W., Elizabeth M. King, William H. Peck, Colin M. Graham, & Simon A. Wilde. (2001). The Cool Early Earth: Oxygen Isotope Evidence for Continental Crust and Oceans on Earth at 4.4 Ga. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2001. 2 indexed citations
17.
King, Elizabeth M. & M. Anne Hill. (1993). Women's education in developing countries. The World Bank eBooks. 209 indexed citations
18.
King, Elizabeth M., et al.. (1990). Narrowing the Education Gender Gap in Developing Countries. RAND Corporation eBooks.
19.
King, Elizabeth M.. (1976). Time allocation in Philippine rural households. 2 indexed citations
20.
Waller, Julian A., et al.. (1969). Alcohol and other factors in California highway fatalities.. PubMed. 14(4). 429–44. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026