Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Career Benefits Associated With Mentoring for Proteges: A Meta-Analysis.
20041.1k citationsTammy D. Allen, Lillian T. Eby et al.Journal of Applied Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Lentz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Lentz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Lentz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Lentz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Lentz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Lentz. The network helps show where Elizabeth Lentz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Lentz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Lentz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Lentz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Lentz. Elizabeth Lentz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lentz, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). Impact of Fertilizer Applicator Certification Training (FACT) Programs on Producer Perceptions and Practices in Ohio. 10(2).1 indexed citations
3.
Lentz, Elizabeth, et al.. (2009). Review of Interventions for Reducing Enlisted Attrition in the U.S. Military: An Update.2 indexed citations
Lentz, Elizabeth. (2007). Protege and mentor characteristics: Examining individual differences in effective mentoring relationships. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida).7 indexed citations
7.
Bruk‐Lee, Valentina, Lisa M. Penney, Walter C. Borman, et al.. (2006). Evaluation and Refinement of a Screening Instrument for U.S. Army Recruiters: Noncommissioned Officer Leadership Skills Inventory. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).3 indexed citations
Lentz, Elizabeth, et al.. (2005). Concurrent Validation of the NLSI for U.S. Army Drill Sergeants. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
14.
Allen, Tammy D., Lillian T. Eby, Mark L. Poteet, Elizabeth Lentz, & Lizzette Lima. (2004). Career Benefits Associated With Mentoring for Proteges: A Meta-Analysis.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(1). 127–136.1070 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Lentz, Elizabeth. (2004). The Link Between the Career Plateau and Mentoring – Addressing the Empirical Gap. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida).10 indexed citations
Buzen, Jeffrey P., et al.. (1978). BEST/1 - Design of a tool for computer system capacity planning.. 447–455.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.