David M. Tokar

3.2k total citations
46 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

David M. Tokar is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, David M. Tokar has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Clinical Psychology, 16 papers in Safety Research and 14 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in David M. Tokar's work include Career Development and Diversity (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (12 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (10 papers). David M. Tokar is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (12 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (10 papers). David M. Tokar collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. David M. Tokar's co-authors include Jane L. Swanson, Ann R. Fischer, Linda Mezydlo Subich, Michael P Schaub, LaRae M. Jome, Bonnie Moradi, Rosalie J. Hall, Glenn E. Good, Melanie S. Hill and Janice D. Yoder and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Journal of Counseling Psychology.

In The Last Decade

David M. Tokar

46 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

David M. Tokar

EDUCA

Linda Mezydlo Subich United States

Dale R. Fuqua United States

Susan C. Whiston United States

Mary J. Heppner United States

Margaret M. Nauta United States

Paul J. Hartung United States

Karen M. O’Brien United States

Hung‐Bin Sheu United States

Lisa Y. Flores United States

Bradley R. Brenner United States

Linda Mezydlo Subich United States

David M. Tokar

778 ×1.0

581 ×0.7

485 ×0.8

EDUCA

581 ×1.0

814 ×1.4

Citations per year, relative to David M. Tokar David M. Tokar (= 1×) peers Linda Mezydlo Subich

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Tokar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Tokar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Tokar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Tokar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Tokar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Tokar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Tokar. The network helps show where David M. Tokar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Tokar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Tokar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Tokar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Tokar. David M. Tokar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tokar, David M., Mark L. Savickas, & Kevin P. Kaut. (2019). A Test of the Career Construction Theory Model of Adaptation in Adult Workers With Chiari Malformation. Journal of Career Assessment. 28(3). 381–401. 31 indexed citations

Allen, Philip A., Douglas L. Delahanty, Kevin P. Kaut, et al.. (2017). Chiari 1000 Registry Project: assessment of surgical outcome on self-focused attention, pain, and delayed recall. Psychological Medicine. 48(10). 1634–1643. 26 indexed citations

Tokar, David M., et al.. (2016). An Examination of the Applicability of Social Cognitive Career Theory for African American College Students. Journal of Career Assessment. 25(1). 75–92. 26 indexed citations

Tokar, David M., et al.. (2014). Predicting religious ethnocentrism: Evidence for a partial mediation model.. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. 8(1). 25–34. 9 indexed citations

Scheuermann, Taneisha S., David M. Tokar, & Rosalie J. Hall. (2014). An investigation of African-American women's prestige domain interests and choice goals using Social Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 84(3). 273–282. 12 indexed citations

Tokar, David M., et al.. (2012). The HEXACO and five-factor models of personality in relation to RIASEC vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 81(2). 138–149. 52 indexed citations

Phillips, Julia C., et al.. (2004). Influencing Client Expectations About Career Counseling Using a Videotaped Intervention. The Career Development Quarterly. 52(4). 309–322. 14 indexed citations

Tokar, David M., Rosalie J. Hall, & Bonnie Moradi. (2003). Planting a tree while envisioning the forest--The recursive relation between theory and research: Reply to Blustein (2003).. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 50(1). 24–27. 2 indexed citations

Tokar, David M., et al.. (2003). Structural and discriminant validity of the career factors inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 65(2). 239–254. 13 indexed citations

10.

Walker, Donald F., David M. Tokar, & Ann R. Fischer. (2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality.. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 1(2). 98–108. 1 indexed citations

11.

Tokar, David M., Ann R. Fischer, Michael P Schaub, & Bonnie Moradi. (2000). Masculine gender roles and counseling-related variables: Links with and mediation by personality.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 47(3). 380–393. 35 indexed citations

12.

Fischer, Ann R., et al.. (2000). Assessing Women's Feminist Identity Development: Studies of Convergent, Discriminant, and Structural Validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 24(1). 15–29. 144 indexed citations

13.

Tokar, David M., Ann R. Fischer, Michael Schaub, & Bonnie Moradi. (2000). Masculine gender roles and counseling-related variables: Links with and mediation by personality.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 47(3). 380–393. 1 indexed citations

14.

Young, Graham, David M. Tokar, & Linda Mezydlo Subich. (1998). Congruence Revisited: Do 11 Indices Differentially Predict Job Satisfaction and Is the Relation Moderated by Person and Situation Variables?. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 52(2). 208–223. 66 indexed citations

15.

Tokar, David M. & Ann R. Fischer. (1998). Psychometric Analysis of the Racial Identity Attitude Scale—Long Form. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 31(3). 138–149. 11 indexed citations

16.

Fischer, Ann R., et al.. (1998). Validity and construct contamination of the Racial Identity Attitude Scale—Long Form.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 45(2). 212–224. 29 indexed citations

17.

Tokar, David M. & Ann R. Fischer. (1998). More on RIASEC and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Direct Assessment of Prediger's (1982) and Hogan's (1983) Dimensions. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 52(2). 246–259. 20 indexed citations

18.

Swanson, Jane L., et al.. (1996). Assessing Perceptions of Career-Related Barriers: The Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment. 4(2). 219–244. 176 indexed citations

19.

Tinsley, Howard E. A., et al.. (1994). Client Expectations About Counseling and Involvement During Career Counseling. The Career Development Quarterly. 42(4). 326–336. 30 indexed citations

20.

Swanson, Jane L. & David M. Tokar. (1991). Development and initial validation of the Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 39(3). 344–361. 113 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact