Jane E. Workman

3.0k total citations
113 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Jane E. Workman is a scholar working on Marketing, Museology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane E. Workman has authored 113 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Marketing, 33 papers in Museology and 26 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane E. Workman's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (43 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (33 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (20 papers). Jane E. Workman is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (43 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (33 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (20 papers). Jane E. Workman collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Jane E. Workman's co-authors include Seung‐Hee Lee, Siwon Cho, Kim K. P. Johnson, Seung‐Hee Lee, Yuli Liang, Kwangho Jung, Elizabeth Lentz, Yoon‐Hee Kwon, Seung‐Hee Lee and M. Jo Kallal and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability, Sex Roles and Journal of Consumer Marketing.

In The Last Decade

Jane E. Workman

108 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane E. Workman United States 24 1.3k 615 448 320 270 113 2.1k
Mary Lynn Damhorst United States 23 1.1k 0.8× 360 0.6× 420 0.9× 216 0.7× 107 0.4× 61 1.7k
Sara Rosengren Sweden 25 1.4k 1.1× 1.0k 1.7× 38 0.1× 140 0.4× 216 0.8× 51 2.0k
Veena Chattaraman United States 17 672 0.5× 606 1.0× 81 0.2× 259 0.8× 60 0.2× 44 1.3k
Frédéric F. Brunel United States 17 1.3k 1.0× 948 1.5× 33 0.1× 656 2.0× 223 0.8× 40 2.2k
Debra L. Stephens United States 15 645 0.5× 510 0.8× 34 0.1× 160 0.5× 125 0.5× 28 1.5k
Agnès Nairn United Kingdom 19 749 0.6× 558 0.9× 36 0.1× 190 0.6× 79 0.3× 53 1.3k
Yingjiao Xu United States 23 1.3k 1.0× 704 1.1× 139 0.3× 90 0.3× 48 0.2× 56 1.7k
Susan E. Heckler United States 14 1.4k 1.1× 937 1.5× 20 0.0× 365 1.1× 421 1.6× 19 2.2k
Vanessa M. Patrick United States 25 1.3k 1.0× 581 0.9× 32 0.1× 745 2.3× 410 1.5× 76 2.3k
Jason M. Carpenter United States 22 1.2k 0.9× 488 0.8× 47 0.1× 100 0.3× 124 0.5× 44 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Workman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Workman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Workman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Workman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Workman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Workman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Workman. The network helps show where Jane E. Workman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane E. Workman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane E. Workman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane E. Workman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane E. Workman. Jane E. Workman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lee, Seung‐Hee & Jane E. Workman. (2023). Online Shopping Attitudes, Need for Touch, and Interdependent Self-Construal among Korean College Students. Korea Observer - Institute of Korean Studies. 54(2). 295–320. 1 indexed citations
2.
Workman, Jane E. & Seung‐Hee Lee. (2019). Fashion trendsetting, attitudes toward money, and tendency to regret. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 47(11). 1203–1222. 10 indexed citations
3.
Liang, Yuli, Seunghee Lee, & Jane E. Workman. (2018). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Consumer Perceptions of Fashion AI. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 75(1).
4.
Lee, Seung‐Hee & Jane E. Workman. (2014). Determinants of brand loyalty: self-construal, self-expressive brands, and brand attachment. International Journal of Fashion Design Technology and Education. 8(1). 12–20. 38 indexed citations
5.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2013). Family environment and creativity in fashion design students. International Journal of Fashion Design Technology and Education. 6(3). 200–209. 15 indexed citations
6.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2011). Linear Measurement and Linear Measurement Estimation Skills in Apparel Design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 29(2). 150–164. 5 indexed citations
7.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2011). Rationales and Norms for Teacher Dress Codes: A Review of Employee Handbooks. NASSP Bulletin. 95(1). 31–45. 4 indexed citations
8.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2010). Spatial Visualization Skills of Apparel Industry Professionals. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 102(4). 30. 2 indexed citations
9.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2010). Teacher Dress Codes in Employee Handbooks: An Analysis.. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 102(3). 9–15. 4 indexed citations
10.
Workman, Jane E. & Seung‐Hee Lee. (2010). Vanity and public self‐consciousness: a comparison of fashion consumer groups and gender. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 35(3). 307–315. 55 indexed citations
11.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2008). Promotional Product Marketing, College Students, and Social Identity. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 100(1). 43–49. 1 indexed citations
12.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2008). At-Risk Youth Appearance and Job Performance Evaluation.. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 100(3). 14–21. 2 indexed citations
13.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2006). Safety and Security in a School Environment: The Role of Dress Code Policies.. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 98(2). 19–24. 4 indexed citations
14.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2004). Rationale for Student Dress Codes: A Review of School Handbooks. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 96(1). 77–82. 4 indexed citations
15.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2004). Sanctions Connected to Dress Code Violations in Secondary School Handbooks. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 96(4). 40–46. 3 indexed citations
16.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2003). Ownership of Offensive T-Shirts and Problem Behavior in High School Students. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 95(3). 32. 3 indexed citations
17.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (2000). Dress and Appearance Codes in Public Secondary School Handbooks. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 92(5). 68–76. 7 indexed citations
18.
Workman, Jane E., et al.. (1996). Consumer Responses to Fashion Advertisements Using Models in Wheelchairs: Is There a Relationship to Consumers' Optimum Stimulation Level?. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 24(3). 237–253. 3 indexed citations
19.
Workman, Jane E. & Kim K. P. Johnson. (1989). The Role of Clothing in Perpetuating Ageism.. Journal of home economics. 81(3). 11–15. 7 indexed citations
20.
Workman, Jane E.. (1988). Trait Inferences Based on Perceived Ownership of Designer, Brand Name, or Store Brand Jeans. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 6(2). 23–29. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026