Elizabeth de Groot

588 total citations
10 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth de Groot is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth de Groot has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth de Groot's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper). Elizabeth de Groot is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper). Elizabeth de Groot collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Arab Emirates and China. Elizabeth de Groot's co-authors include Stuart A. Karabenick, Jeanne M. Friedel, Christina R. Bonney, Toni M. Kempler, Melissa C. Gilbert, Lauren Musu, Michael E. Woolley, Catherine Nickerson, Avi Kaplan and Hubert Korzilius and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Psychologist, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication and International Journal of Applied Linguistics.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth de Groot

10 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Elizabeth de Groot

EDUCA

ECP

SP

DEP

SPS

Robyn Ewing Australia

Anne Podolsky United States

Margot Soven United States

Fabian Wolff Germany

Monika Finsterwald Austria

Nicolas Hübner Germany

Carl Lamote Belgium

David B. Morris United States

Amrita Kaur Malaysia

Nicholas Sorensen United States

Robyn Ewing Australia

Elizabeth de Groot

534 ×3.1

EDUCA

76 ×0.6

ECP

83 ×0.7

SP

70 ×0.8

DEP

84 ×1.8

SPS

Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth de Groot Elizabeth de Groot (= 1×) peers Robyn Ewing

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth de Groot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth de Groot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth de Groot. The network helps show where Elizabeth de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth de Groot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth de Groot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth de Groot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth de Groot. Elizabeth de Groot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Hornikx, Jos & Elizabeth de Groot. (2017). Cultural values adapted to individualism–collectivism in advertising in Western Europe: An experimental and meta-analytical approach. International Communication Gazette. 79(3). 298–316. 12 indexed citations

2.

Groot, Elizabeth de, Catherine Nickerson, Hubert Korzilius, & Marinel Gerritsen. (2015). Picture This. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 30(2). 165–201. 19 indexed citations

3.

Hendriks, Berna, Frank van Meurs, & Elizabeth de Groot. (2015). The effects of degrees ofDutch accentedness inELFand inFrench,German andSpanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 27(1). 44–66. 14 indexed citations

4.

Hoffman, M. Timm, et al.. (2015). Grassroots Ideas for Sustainable CSR Programs for the Oil & Gas Industry in Indonesia, Lessons Learned From Other Sectors. 1 indexed citations

5.

Gillaerts, Paul, et al.. (2012). Researching Discourse in Business Genres. 2 indexed citations

6.

Groot, Elizabeth de, Hubert Korzilius, Marinel Gerritsen, & Catherine Nickerson. (2010). There's No Place Like Home: UK-Based Financial Analysts' Response to Dutch-English and British-English Annual Report Texts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 54(1). 1–17. 10 indexed citations

7.

Hornikx, Jos, et al.. (2010). Is het aanpassen van advertenties aan culturele waarden in West-Europa zinvol?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 32(2). 114–127. 6 indexed citations

8.

Kaplan, Avi, Stuart A. Karabenick, & Elizabeth de Groot. (2009). Culture, self, and, motivation : essays in honor of Martin L. Maehr. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 41 indexed citations

9.

Karabenick, Stuart A., Michael E. Woolley, Jeanne M. Friedel, et al.. (2007). Cognitive Processing of Self-Report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean?. Educational Psychologist. 42(3). 139–151. 278 indexed citations

10.

Nickerson, Catherine & Elizabeth de Groot. (2005). Dear shareholder, dear stockholder, dear stakeholder: The business letter genre in the annual general report. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 324–346. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact