Elizabeth Brey

599 total citations
10 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Brey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Brey has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Brey's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers). Elizabeth Brey is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers). Elizabeth Brey collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Elizabeth Brey's co-authors include Kristin Shutts, Kristina R. Olson, Kristin Pauker, Jonathan S. Beier, Deborah L. Linebarger, Sandra L. Calvert, Rachel Barr, Annie M. Moses, Sarah E. Vaala and Tiffany A. Pempek and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Child Development and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Brey

10 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Elizabeth Brey United States	7	185	152	116	112	51	10	316
Lili Ma Canada	11	103 0.6×	139 0.9×	304 2.6×	144 1.3×	90 1.8×	18	453
Jocelyn Dautel United Kingdom	10	253 1.4×	164 1.1×	77 0.7×	62 0.6×	70 1.4×	26	379
Jellie Sierksma Netherlands	12	244 1.3×	223 1.5×	96 0.8×	84 0.8×	108 2.1×	20	410
Rachel Leshin United States	7	92 0.5×	82 0.5×	82 0.7×	77 0.7×	18 0.4×	15	220
Aishah Bakhtiar Canada	7	87 0.5×	90 0.6×	199 1.7×	172 1.5×	33 0.6×	9	390
Wendelyn J. Shore United States	10	64 0.3×	153 1.0×	114 1.0×	68 0.6×	68 1.3×	16	355
Kimberly E. Vanderbilt United States	7	138 0.7×	102 0.7×	272 2.3×	89 0.8×	107 2.1×	9	368
Kristi L. Lockhart United States	11	113 0.6×	152 1.0×	229 2.0×	96 0.9×	101 2.0×	21	412
Shaylene E. Nancekivell United States	9	79 0.4×	115 0.8×	159 1.4×	80 0.7×	110 2.2×	22	344
Christina M. Tworek United States	2	159 0.9×	120 0.8×	133 1.1×	41 0.4×	69 1.4×	2	302

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Brey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Brey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Brey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Brey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Brey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Brey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Brey. The network helps show where Elizabeth Brey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Brey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Brey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Brey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Brey. Elizabeth Brey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Killen, Melanie, et al.. (2024). Children and adolescents rectify unequal allocations of leadership duties in the classroom. Child Development. 95(6). 1950–1966. 2 indexed citations

Sierksma, Jellie, Elizabeth Brey, & Kristin Shutts. (2022). Racial Stereotype Application in 4-to-8-Year-Old White American Children: Emergence and Specificity. Journal of Cognition and Development. 23(5). 660–685. 3 indexed citations

Brey, Elizabeth & Kristin Pauker. (2019). Teachers’ nonverbal behaviors influence children’s stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 188. 104671–104671. 29 indexed citations

Pauker, Kristin, et al.. (2018). Cultural Snapshots: A Method to Capture Social Contexts in Development of Prejudice and Stereotyping. Advances in child development and behavior. 56. 141–181. 2 indexed citations

Brey, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). Children’s developing judgments about the physical manifestations of power.. Developmental Psychology. 55(4). 793–808. 39 indexed citations

Brey, Elizabeth & Kristin Shutts. (2018). Children use nonverbal cues from an adult to evaluate peers. Journal of Cognition and Development. 19(2). 121–136. 25 indexed citations

Shutts, Kristin, et al.. (2016). Children Use Wealth Cues to Evaluate Others. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0149360–e0149360. 126 indexed citations

Brey, Elizabeth & Kristin Shutts. (2014). Children Use Nonverbal Cues to Make Inferences About Social Power. Child Development. 86(1). 276–286. 65 indexed citations

Barr, Rachel, Elizabeth Brey, Tiffany A. Pempek, et al.. (2010). Interactional quality depicted in infant and toddler videos: where are the interactions?. Infant and Child Development. 19(6). 594–612. 8 indexed citations

10.

Vaala, Sarah E., Deborah L. Linebarger, Elizabeth Brey, et al.. (2010). Content analysis of language‐promoting teaching strategies used in infant‐directed media. Infant and Child Development. 19(6). 628–648. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact