Edward Peck
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tim FreemanPerri SixPauline GulliverHelen DickinsonNick GoodwinJenny SeckerJanet FieldJon Glasby
- Topics
- Healthcare innovation and challenges (25 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (16 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Public AdministrationOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Edward Peck
76 papers receiving 704 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- General Health Professions 371
- Education 221
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 171
- Clinical Psychology 128
- Sociology and Political Science 117
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Peck
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Peck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Peck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Peck. The network helps show where Edward Peck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward Peck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward Peck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward Peck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward Peck. Edward Peck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | How can PCTs shape, reflect and increase public value? | 5 |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Joint commissioning. Going halves. | 1 |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | London's Mental Health. | 47 |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Edward Peck
Edward Peck is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Public Administration and General Health Professions, having authored 82 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (25 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (16 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (80 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (171 citations) and General Health Professions (371 citations). Edward Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Tim Freeman, Perri Six, Pauline Gulliver, Helen Dickinson, Nick Goodwin, Jenny Secker, Janet Field, Jon Glasby, Deborah Davidson and Hannah Smith. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Implementation Science and Geographical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.