Pauline Gulliver
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dorothy BeggJanet FanslowTracy K. McIntoshLadan HashemiEdward PeckArturo González-IzquierdoPeter SidebothamJohn Fluke
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (34 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (23 papers)Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Pauline Gulliver
79 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Clinical Psychology 439
- General Health Professions 378
- Health 337
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 280
- Sociology and Political Science 246
Countries citing papers authored by Pauline Gulliver
This map shows the geographic impact of Pauline Gulliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pauline Gulliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pauline Gulliver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pauline Gulliver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pauline Gulliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pauline Gulliver. The network helps show where Pauline Gulliver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pauline Gulliver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pauline Gulliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pauline Gulliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pauline Gulliver. Pauline Gulliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | Why do we keep meeting like this? The corporate board as ritual in health and social care | 1 |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Pauline Gulliver
Pauline Gulliver is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (34 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (23 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (337 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (194 citations) and Clinical Psychology (439 citations). Pauline Gulliver has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy Begg, Janet Fanslow, Tracy K. McIntosh, Ladan Hashemi, Edward Peck, Arturo González-Izquierdo, Peter Sidebotham, John Fluke, Ruth Gilbert and Staffan Janson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.