Edward Kulick

604 total citations
9 papers, 472 citations indexed

About

Edward Kulick is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edward Kulick has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 472 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 3 papers in Education and 2 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Edward Kulick's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (5 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper). Edward Kulick is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (5 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper). Edward Kulick collaborates with scholars based in United States. Edward Kulick's co-authors include Neil J. Dorans, Ping Hu, Jason Millman, Karen Mitchell, Frank Jenkins, Nancy L. Allen, John Mazzeo, Marianne Perie and Kentaro Yamamoto and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Care, Research in Higher Education and Journal of Educational Measurement.

In The Last Decade

Edward Kulick

9 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Edward Kulick United States	7	309	144	118	107	103	9	472
H. Swaminathan United States	8	278 0.9×	158 1.1×	81 0.7×	76 0.7×	69 0.7×	14	458
Janice Dowd Scheuneman United States	9	187 0.6×	73 0.5×	120 1.0×	72 0.7×	66 0.6×	23	370
Alicia P. Schmitt United States	13	274 0.9×	111 0.8×	125 1.1×	108 1.0×	102 1.0×	29	494
H. D. Hoover United States	9	313 1.0×	173 1.2×	294 2.5×	142 1.3×	100 1.0×	32	689
Robert A. Forsyth United States	12	211 0.7×	119 0.8×	140 1.2×	51 0.5×	50 0.5×	39	441
Robert L. McKinley United States	12	358 1.2×	254 1.8×	72 0.6×	74 0.7×	62 0.6×	30	570
Mary Pommerich United States	10	235 0.8×	103 0.7×	177 1.5×	61 0.6×	61 0.6×	30	537
Gautam Puhan United States	11	247 0.8×	91 0.6×	127 1.1×	85 0.8×	56 0.5×	53	464
Jeffrey A. Slinde United States	8	174 0.6×	72 0.5×	149 1.3×	67 0.6×	73 0.7×	9	472
Keith A. Boughton Canada	9	220 0.7×	114 0.8×	70 0.6×	51 0.5×	68 0.7×	14	354

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Kulick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Kulick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Kulick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Kulick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Kulick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Kulick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Kulick. The network helps show where Edward Kulick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward Kulick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward Kulick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward Kulick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward Kulick. Edward Kulick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dorans, Neil J. & Edward Kulick. (2006). Differential Item Functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination. Medical Care. 44(Suppl 3). S107–S114. 44 indexed citations

2.

Mazzeo, John, et al.. (2006). Technical Report for the 2000 Market-Basket Study in Mathematics. 2 indexed citations

3.

Allen, Nancy L., et al.. (1997). Technical Report of the NAEP 1996 State Assessment Program in Mathematics.. 9 indexed citations

4.

Yamamoto, Kentaro & Edward Kulick. (1992). An Information-Based Approach To Monitoring Content Validity and Determining the Relative Value of Polytomous and Dichotomous Items.. 2 indexed citations

5.

Kulick, Edward & Ping Hu. (1989). EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING AND ITEM DIFFICULTY. ETS Research Report Series. 1989(1). 24 indexed citations

6.

Kulick, Edward & Ping Hu. (1989). Examining the Relationship between Differential Item Functioning and Item Difficulty. College Board Report No. 89-5.. 17 indexed citations

7.

Dorans, Neil J. & Edward Kulick. (1986). DEMONSTRATING THE UTILITY OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST. Journal of Educational Measurement. 23(4). 355–368. 289 indexed citations

8.

Millman, Jason, et al.. (1983). Does grade inflation affect the reliability of grades?. Research in Higher Education. 19(4). 423–429. 24 indexed citations

9.

Dorans, Neil J. & Edward Kulick. (1983). ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE OF FEMALE CANDIDATES ON SAT AND TSWE FORMS ADMINISTERED IN DECEMBER 1977: AN APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH1. ETS Research Report Series. 1983(1). 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact