Edna Greene Brabham

23 total papers · 555 total citations
20 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Edna Greene Brabham is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Edna Greene Brabham has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 9 papers in Education and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Edna Greene Brabham's work include Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (3 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (3 papers). Edna Greene Brabham is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (3 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (3 papers). Edna Greene Brabham collaborates with scholars based in United States. Edna Greene Brabham's co-authors include Carol Lynch‐Brown, Susan Kidd Villaume, Bruce A. Murray, Steven B. Silvern and M. Elizabeth Ross and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, The Reading Teacher and Early Childhood Education Journal.

In The Last Decade

Edna Greene Brabham

19 papers receiving 242 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Edna Greene Brabham 224 204 42 41 32 20 327
Thomas G. Gunning 213 1.0× 195 1.0× 59 1.4× 52 1.3× 38 1.2× 21 354
Ana Taboada Barber 223 1.0× 172 0.8× 36 0.9× 21 0.5× 23 0.7× 22 331
Kenneth Hoskisson 135 0.6× 222 1.1× 90 2.1× 43 1.0× 36 1.1× 17 303
Susan Kidd Villaume 137 0.6× 183 0.9× 16 0.4× 36 0.9× 22 0.7× 23 252
Chase Young 232 1.0× 259 1.3× 55 1.3× 35 0.9× 32 1.0× 39 362
Paul C. Burns 121 0.5× 199 1.0× 91 2.2× 34 0.8× 25 0.8× 35 347
Sherry Kragler 154 0.7× 251 1.2× 35 0.8× 15 0.4× 30 0.9× 21 320
Lorraine Hammond 211 0.9× 227 1.1× 33 0.8× 27 0.7× 10 0.3× 19 349
Judith Westphal Irwin 200 0.9× 165 0.8× 26 0.6× 52 1.3× 61 1.9× 17 336
Mary DeKonty Applegate 190 0.8× 214 1.0× 55 1.3× 17 0.4× 55 1.7× 17 335

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Greene Brabham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Greene Brabham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Greene Brabham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Greene Brabham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Greene Brabham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Greene Brabham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Greene Brabham. The network helps show where Edna Greene Brabham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edna Greene Brabham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edna Greene Brabham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edna Greene Brabham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edna Greene Brabham. Edna Greene Brabham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026