Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss

420 citations
8 papers · 260 indexed · h-index 6
Co-authors
Joyce M. Richey
Topics
Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers)Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss

8 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Education 190
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 125
  • Statistics and Probability 53
  • Language and Linguistics 31
  • Literature and Literary Theory 21
Replace Anne P. Sweet with:
Anne P. Sweet United States
Cecilia Henríquez Fernández United States
Jerry L. Johns United States
Wayne M. Linek United States
Nancy Nesbitt Vacc United States
Nami Shin United States
Marsha Riddle Buly United States
Kerry Hempenstall Australia
Joanna Nijakowska Poland
John W. Glenn Norway
Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss relative to Anne P. Sweet United States Anne P. Sweet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anne P. Sweet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss. The network helps show where Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss. Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 15
3 5
4
Does Action Research Count as Scientifically-Based Research? A Vygotskian Mediational Response.
2
5
Using Literature as a Context for Teaching Vocabulary.
18
6
Vygotsky in the Classroom: Mediated Literacy Instruction and Assessment
118
7 18
8 77

About Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss

Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 8 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (125 citations), Education (190 citations) and Statistics and Probability (53 citations). Lisbeth Dixon-Krauss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joyce M. Richey. Their work appears in journals such as Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy and Journal of Research in Childhood Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026