Carol Lynch‐Brown
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers)Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers)Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Educational PsychologyEarly Child Development and CarePeabody Journal of Education
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Carol Lynch‐Brown
12 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Education 198
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 148
- Literature and Literary Theory 62
- Sociology and Political Science 59
- Information Systems 42
Countries citing papers authored by Carol Lynch‐Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Carol Lynch‐Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol Lynch‐Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol Lynch‐Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carol Lynch‐Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol Lynch‐Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol Lynch‐Brown. The network helps show where Carol Lynch‐Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carol Lynch‐Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carol Lynch‐Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carol Lynch‐Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carol Lynch‐Brown. Carol Lynch‐Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 125 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Enhancing Social Studies through Literacy Strategies. Bulletin 91. | 11 |
| 6 | Essentials of Children's Literature | 145 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Adventuring with International Literature: One Teacher's Experience. | 2 |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | A National Survey of U.S. University Reading Clinics: Clientele, Functions, and Tests. | 1 |
| 12 | Procedures for Determining Children's Book Choices: Comparison and Criticism | 3 |
About Carol Lynch‐Brown
Carol Lynch‐Brown is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (148 citations), Education (198 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (62 citations). Carol Lynch‐Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edna Greene Brabham, Nancy Fichtman Dana and Judith L. Irvin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Early Child Development and Care and Peabody Journal of Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.