E. Michelle Todd

642 total citations
17 papers, 374 citations indexed

About

E. Michelle Todd is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Michelle Todd has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 374 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Information Systems and Management and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in E. Michelle Todd's work include Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers). E. Michelle Todd is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers). E. Michelle Todd collaborates with scholars based in United States and Mexico. E. Michelle Todd's co-authors include Michael D. Mumford, Teri Aronowitz, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Shane Connelly, Tristan McIntosh, Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Hiroki Sayama, Francis J. Yammarino and Robert Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, The Leadership Quarterly and Creativity Research Journal.

In The Last Decade

E. Michelle Todd

16 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. Michelle Todd United States	10	115	65	64	60	55	17	374
Lauren N. Harkrider United States	13	135 1.2×	119 1.8×	63 1.0×	68 1.1×	59 1.1×	16	509
Carter Gibson United States	11	29 0.3×	40 0.6×	62 1.0×	35 0.6×	85 1.5×	26	353
Melissa M. Robertson United States	8	67 0.6×	72 1.1×	221 3.5×	76 1.3×	101 1.8×	16	444
Tyler J. Mulhearn United States	13	164 1.4×	95 1.5×	72 1.1×	165 2.8×	61 1.1×	29	621
Barbara R. Bucklin United States	8	57 0.5×	48 0.7×	91 1.4×	30 0.5×	64 1.2×	10	493
Sharon Brown-Welty United States	5	68 0.6×	205 3.2×	75 1.2×	45 0.8×	24 0.4×	8	509
Anna Imus United States	6	80 0.7×	80 1.2×	109 1.7×	32 0.5×	140 2.5×	7	415
Gera Noordzij Netherlands	10	103 0.9×	123 1.9×	120 1.9×	27 0.5×	94 1.7×	25	439
Sandra Acosta United States	12	90 0.8×	202 3.1×	63 1.0×	27 0.5×	35 0.6×	25	478
Jordi Riera Romaní Spain	11	88 0.8×	161 2.5×	64 1.0×	24 0.4×	21 0.4×	52	487

Countries citing papers authored by E. Michelle Todd

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Michelle Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Michelle Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Michelle Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Michelle Todd

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Michelle Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Michelle Todd. The network helps show where E. Michelle Todd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Michelle Todd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Michelle Todd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Michelle Todd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Michelle Todd. E. Michelle Todd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Demers, Catherine H., Benjamin L. Hankin, E. Michelle Todd, et al.. (2024). Maternal adverse childhood experiences and infant visual-limbic white matter development. Journal of Affective Disorders. 367. 49–57. 1 indexed citations

Todd, E. Michelle, et al.. (2024). Sleep During Pregnancy and Offspring Outcomes From Infancy to Childhood: A Systematic Review. PubMed. 87(1). 7–32. 2 indexed citations

Todd, E. Michelle, et al.. (2023). Guidelines for training design thinking in organizations. Industrial and Commercial Training. 55(3). 364–374.

Todd, E. Michelle, et al.. (2022). Effective Strategies for Creative Idea Evaluation and Feedback: The customer’s always right. Creativity Research Journal. 35(1). 44–62. 3 indexed citations

Yammarino, Francis J., Shelley D. Dionne, Hiroki Sayama, et al.. (2020). Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups. The Leadership Quarterly. 31(5). 101409–101409. 48 indexed citations

Todd, E. Michelle, et al.. (2019). Bias and Bias Remediation in Creative Problem-Solving: Managing Biases through Forecasting. Creativity Research Journal. 31(1). 1–14. 15 indexed citations

Todd, E. Michelle, et al.. (2017). Effective Practices in the Delivery of Research Ethics Education: A Qualitative Review of Instructional Methods. Accountability in Research. 24(5). 297–321. 29 indexed citations

Todd, E. Michelle, et al.. (2017). A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics. 23(6). 1719–1754. 50 indexed citations

Watts, Logan L., Logan M. Steele, Tyler J. Mulhearn, et al.. (2017). How Did You Like This Course? The Advantages and Limitations of Reaction Criteria in Ethics Education. Ethics & Behavior. 28(6). 483–496. 9 indexed citations

10.

Watts, Logan L., et al.. (2017). Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content. Accountability in Research. 24(5). 269–296. 9 indexed citations

11.

Mulhearn, Tyler J., Logan L. Watts, E. Michelle Todd, et al.. (2016). Validation and Use of a Predictive Modeling Tool: Employing Scientific Findings to Improve Responsible Conduct of Research Education. Accountability in Research. 24(4). 195–210. 6 indexed citations

12.

Mumford, Michael D., et al.. (2016). Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly. 28(1). 24–39. 90 indexed citations

13.

Watts, Logan L., E. Michelle Todd, Tyler J. Mulhearn, et al.. (2016). Qualitative Evaluation Methods in Ethics Education: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Best Practices. Accountability in Research. 24(4). 225–242. 21 indexed citations

14.

Mulhearn, Tyler J., et al.. (2016). Cross-Field Comparison of Ethics Education: Golden Rules and Particulars. Accountability in Research. 24(4). 211–224. 7 indexed citations

15.

Aronowitz, Teri, et al.. (2006). ATTITUDES THAT AFFECT THE ABILITY OF AFRICAN AMERICAN PREADOLESCENT GIRLS AND THEIR MOTHERS TO TALK OPENLY ABOUT SEX. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 28(1). 7–20. 26 indexed citations

16.

Aronowitz, Teri, et al.. (2006). Ecological Influences of Sexuality on Early Adolescent African American Females. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 23(2). 113–122. 22 indexed citations

17.

Aronowitz, Teri, et al.. (2005). Heterosocial Behaviors in Early Adolescent African American Girls: The Role of Mother-Daughter Relationships. Journal of Family Nursing. 11(2). 122–139. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact