Dominik Schreyer
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Marketing top 10%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sascha L. SchmidtBenno TorglerCarl SingletonJ. James ReadeAlex BrysonPeter DoltonLinus WunderlichNicolas Frevel
- Topics
- Sports Analytics and Performance (52 papers)Sports, Gender, and Society (43 papers)Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (41 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Business ResearchJournal of Vocational BehaviorTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dominik Schreyer
60 papers receiving 806 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Economics and Econometrics 657
- Sociology and Political Science 584
- Gender Studies 520
- Marketing 53
- Safety Research 44
Countries citing papers authored by Dominik Schreyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominik Schreyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominik Schreyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominik Schreyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dominik Schreyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominik Schreyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominik Schreyer. The network helps show where Dominik Schreyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominik Schreyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominik Schreyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominik Schreyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dominik Schreyer. Dominik Schreyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | 126 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | [The problems in dealing with the incest experiences of borderline patients]. | 1 |
About Dominik Schreyer
Dominik Schreyer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Decision Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Analytics and Performance (52 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (43 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (41 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (520 citations), Economics and Econometrics (657 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (584 citations). Dominik Schreyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sascha L. Schmidt, Benno Torgler, Carl Singleton, J. James Reade, Alex Bryson, Peter Dolton, Linus Wunderlich, Nicolas Frevel, Andreas Bergmann and Henk Erik Meier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.