Dominik Schreyer

1.3k citations
63 papers · 825 indexed · h-index 17

Dominik Schreyer

60 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Dominik Schreyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Gender Studies 520
  • Economics and Econometrics 657
  • Sociology and Political Science 584
  • General Decision Sciences 18
  • Marketing 53
Replace Brian P. Soebbing with:
Brian P. Soebbing United States
Babatunde Buraimo United Kingdom
Rodney J. Paul United States
Andrew P. Weinbach United States
Joel G. Maxcy United States
Scott Tainsky United States
Martin B. Schmidt United States
Michael A. Leeds United States
Juan de Díos Tena United Kingdom
Chad D. McEvoy United States
Dominik Schreyer relative to Brian P. Soebbing United States Brian P. Soebbing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Brian P. Soebbing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dominik Schreyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dominik Schreyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominik Schreyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominik Schreyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dominik Schreyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominik Schreyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominik Schreyer. The network helps show where Dominik Schreyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Dominik Schreyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dominik Schreyer Line = papers co-authored together Dominik Schreyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20244
4 20232
5 20233
6 20226
7 20222
8 20224
9 20222
10 20219
11 202166
12 2020126
13 202028
14 20191
15 201823
16 201724
17 201718
18 20169
19 201639
20
[The problems in dealing with the incest experiences of borderline patients].
19971

About Dominik Schreyer

Dominik Schreyer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Decision Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Analytics and Performance (52 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (43 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (41 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (3 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (520 citations), Economics and Econometrics (657 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (584 citations). Dominik Schreyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sascha L. Schmidt, Benno Torgler, Carl Singleton, J. James Reade, Alex Bryson, Peter Dolton, Linus Wunderlich, Nicolas Frevel, Andreas Bergmann and Henk Erik Meier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026