Carl Singleton

737 citations
50 papers · 423 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Carl Singleton

41 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Carl Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Gender Studies 203
  • Economics and Econometrics 364
  • Sociology and Political Science 216
  • Safety Research 32
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace Alistair Dawson with:
Alistair Dawson United Kingdom
John Mangan Australia
Georgi Kocharkov Germany
Daniel A. Rascher United States
Frank McIntyre United States
Frank Daumann Germany
Charles H. Mullin United States
Marlene Kim United States
Mathew Dowling United Kingdom
Kailing Shen China
Carl Singleton relative to Alistair Dawson United Kingdom Alistair Dawson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36×
Alistair Dawson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Singleton. The network helps show where Carl Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Carl Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Singleton Line = papers co-authored together Carl Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020131
2 202034
3 202029
4 202025
5 201620
6 202118
7 202116
8 201915
9 201911
10 202010
11 201810
12 20199
13 20237
14 20206
15 20206
16 20186
17 20196
18 20175
19 20215
20 20215

About Carl Singleton

Carl Singleton is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 50 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Analytics and Performance (30 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (21 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (19 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (14 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (203 citations), Economics and Econometrics (364 citations), Sociology and Political Science (216 citations), Safety Research (32 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Carl Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include J. James Reade, Dominik Schreyer, Alex Bryson, Peter Dolton, Luca De Angelis, Giovanni Angelini, Sarah Jewell, Subhasish M. Chowdhury, Lucy Stokes and John Forth. Their work appears in journals such as Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Economics Letters, International Journal of Forecasting, Economic Inquiry and British Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact