Udo Thiel
- Philosophy top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Anthropology
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Geraint ParryManfred KuehnAnn ThomsonMichel MalherbePeter FranceHeiner F. KlemmeRudolf A. MakkreelMary Amanda Stewart
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers)Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the history of philosophyBritish Journal for the History of PhilosophyArchiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
- Partner nations
- AustriaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Udo Thiel
14 papers receiving 146 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 117
- History and Philosophy of Science 72
- Political Science and International Relations 37
- Anthropology 22
- History 16
Countries citing papers authored by Udo Thiel
This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Thiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Thiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Thiel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Thiel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Thiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Thiel. The network helps show where Udo Thiel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Udo Thiel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Udo Thiel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Udo Thiel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Udo Thiel. Udo Thiel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Essay über den menschlichen Verstand | 0 |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | Tracts, ethical, theological and political | 0 |
| 11 | Philosophical Writings of Thomas Cooper | 1 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | Sobre la ecuación de curvatura media prescripta y otras ecuaciones cuasilineales elípticas con soluciones anulándose localmente | 2 |
| 17 | Lockes Theorie der personalen Identität | 6 |
About Udo Thiel
Udo Thiel is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), Philosophy (117 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Udo Thiel has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Geraint Parry, Manfred Kuehn, Ann Thomson, Michel Malherbe, Peter France, Heiner F. Klemme, Rudolf A. Makkreel, Mary Amanda Stewart, Aaron Garrett and Hans Aarsleff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the history of philosophy, British Journal for the History of Philosophy and Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.