Brandon C. Look
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- History
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Gottfried Wilhelm LeibnizR. C. SleighJohn H. ZammitoRichard T. W. ArthurMichael RuseDeborah BoyleCatherine WilsonAndrew S. Pyle
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (8 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Brandon C. Look
11 papers receiving 64 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- History and Philosophy of Science 56
- Philosophy 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 12
- History 8
- Cognitive Neuroscience 7
Countries citing papers authored by Brandon C. Look
This map shows the geographic impact of Brandon C. Look's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brandon C. Look with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brandon C. Look more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brandon C. Look
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brandon C. Look. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brandon C. Look. The network helps show where Brandon C. Look may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brandon C. Look
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brandon C. Look. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brandon C. Look based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brandon C. Look. Brandon C. Look is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | The Continuum companion to Leibniz | 6 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Perfection, power and the passions in Spinoza and Leibniz | 2 |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Confessio Philosophi: Papers Concerning the Problem of Evil, 1671-1678 | 17 |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | “Becoming who one is” in Spinoza and Nietzsche | 1 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Leibniz and the "vinculum substantiale" | 3 |
| 14 | 0 |
About Brandon C. Look
Brandon C. Look is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 79 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Philosophy (49 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Brandon C. Look has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, R. C. Sleigh, John H. Zammito, Richard T. W. Arthur, Michael Ruse, Deborah Boyle, Catherine Wilson, Andrew S. Pyle, François Duchesneau and Justin E. H. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy Compass, The Southern Journal of Philosophy and Journal of the history of philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.