Brandon C. Look
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 8
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 2
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 1
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 1
-
- Historical Astronomy and Related Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Gottfried Wilhelm LeibnizR. C. SleighJohn H. ZammitoRichard T. W. ArthurMichael RuseDeborah BoyleCatherine WilsonAndrew S. Pyle
- Journals
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy (2 papers)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Journal of the history of philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Brandon C. Look
11 papers receiving 64 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- History and Philosophy of Science 56
- Philosophy 49
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 12
- General Psychology 1
Countries citing papers authored by Brandon C. Look
This map shows the geographic impact of Brandon C. Look's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brandon C. Look with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brandon C. Look more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brandon C. Look
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brandon C. Look. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brandon C. Look. The network helps show where Brandon C. Look may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Brandon C. Look, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 2 | The Continuum companion to Leibniz | 2011 | 6 |
| 3 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 4 | Perfection, power and the passions in Spinoza and Leibniz | 2007 | 2 |
| 5 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 7 | Confessio Philosophi: Papers Concerning the Problem of Evil, 1671-1678 | 2004 | 17 |
| 8 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 11 | “Becoming who one is” in Spinoza and Nietzsche | 2001 | 1 |
| 12 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 13 | Leibniz and the "vinculum substantiale" | 1999 | 3 |
| 14 | 1998 | 0 |
About Brandon C. Look
Brandon C. Look is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 79 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Augustinian Studies and Theology (1 paper) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Philosophy (49 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Brandon C. Look has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, R. C. Sleigh, John H. Zammito, Richard T. W. Arthur, Michael Ruse, Deborah Boyle, Catherine Wilson, Andrew S. Pyle, François Duchesneau and Justin E. H. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal for the History of Philosophy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Journal of the history of philosophy, Philosophy Compass and Continuum eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.