Alan Gabbey

1.1k citations
14 papers · 166 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • History of Science and Medicine
  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Papers in

Alan Gabbey

11 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers

Alan Gabbey
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • History and Philosophy of Science 71
  • Philosophy 112
  • History 13
  • Anthropology 12
  • Religious studies 6
Replace Wim Klever with:
Wim Klever United States
Andrew Pyle India
Ralph Cudworth
Sextus Empiricus
Armand Maurer Hungary
Peter A. Schouls Canada
Gustavo Costa United States
Fernand Van Steenberghen
Norma E. Emerton
Allison P. Coudert United States
Alan Gabbey relative to Wim Klever United States Wim Klever's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wim Klever · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Gabbey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Gabbey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Gabbey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Gabbey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Gabbey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Gabbey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Gabbey. The network helps show where Alan Gabbey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alan Gabbey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Gabbey Line = papers co-authored together Alan Gabbey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1995113
2 197123
3 201610
4 19925
5 20084
6 19844
7 19912
8 20032
9 20011
10 19771
11 19981
12 20140
13 19730
14 19980

About Alan Gabbey

Alan Gabbey is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (71 citations), Philosophy (112 citations), History (13 citations), Anthropology (12 citations) and Religious studies (6 citations). Alan Gabbey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pierre‐François Moreau, Margaret D. Wilson, Wim Klever, Don Garrett, Michael Della Rocca, Richard H. Popkin, Don Garrett, Edwin Curley, Alan Donagan and Jonathan Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Isis, Journal of the History of Ideas, Journal of the history of philosophy and Endeavour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact