J.M.M.H. Thijssen
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Anthropology
- History top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (7 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of the History of IdeasBoston studies in the philosophy of science
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
J.M.M.H. Thijssen
15 papers receiving 57 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- History and Philosophy of Science 42
- Philosophy 34
- Anthropology 15
- History 15
- Political Science and International Relations 11
Countries citing papers authored by J.M.M.H. Thijssen
This map shows the geographic impact of J.M.M.H. Thijssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M.M.H. Thijssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M.M.H. Thijssen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.M.M.H. Thijssen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M.M.H. Thijssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M.M.H. Thijssen. The network helps show where J.M.M.H. Thijssen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M.M.H. Thijssen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M.M.H. Thijssen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M.M.H. Thijssen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.M.M.H. Thijssen. J.M.M.H. Thijssen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima | 13 |
| 4 | The reception of the Galilean science of motion in seventeenth-century Europe | 1 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Late-Medieval Natural Philosophy: Some Recent Trends in Scholarship | 3 |
| 8 | The Quest for Certain Knowledge in the Fourteenth Century. Nicholas of Autrecourt Against the Academics | 1 |
| 9 | The Quest for Certain Knowledge in the Fourteenth Century | 1 |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Twins as monsters: Albertus Magnus's theory of the generation of twins and its philosophical context. | 8 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 |
About J.M.M.H. Thijssen
J.M.M.H. Thijssen is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 17 papers that have together received 84 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (7 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations), Philosophy (34 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations). J.M.M.H. Thijssen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul J.J.M. Bakker, William J. Courtenay and Jean Buridan. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of the History of Ideas and Boston studies in the philosophy of science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.