Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

11.6k citations
753 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

708 papers receiving 11.0k citations

Peers

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Health Informatics 471
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5.7k
  • General Health Professions 4.6k
  • Safety Research 1.2k
  • Health 959
Replace Perspectives on Medical Education with:
Perspectives on Medical Education United States
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare Australia
Accountability in Research United States
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Australia
Ethics & Behavior United States
Perspectives in Clinical Research India
Nursing Philosophy United Kingdom
Nurse Researcher United Kingdom
Journal of Mixed Methods Research United States
Developing World Bioethics United States
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics relative to Perspectives on Medical Education United States Perspectives on Medical Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Perspectives on Medical Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.

About Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

The 753 papers published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 11.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics usually cover Health Informatics (28 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (507 papers), General Health Professions (342 papers), Safety Research (71 papers) and Health (51 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (478 papers), Ethics in medical practice (172 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (109 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (65 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (62 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (55 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (55 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics are Raymond De Vries, Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson, Susan Bull, Christine Grady, Elizabeth Buchanan, Douglas Wassenaar, Jessica Ball, Patricia A. Marshall and Celia B. Fisher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact