Laurel K. Leslie
- Safety Research top 0.05%
- Child Welfare and Adoption 39
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 50
- Child Abuse and Trauma 39
- General Health Professions top 0.2%
- Child and Adolescent Health 55
- Speech and Hearing top 0.5%
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare 23
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 28
-
- Diversity and Career in Medicine 27
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 21
Laurel K. Leslie
187 papers receiving 6.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Safety Research 2.3k
- Clinical Psychology 3.4k
- General Health Professions 2.6k
- Speech and Hearing 503
- Psychiatry and Mental health 746
Countries citing papers authored by Laurel K. Leslie
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurel K. Leslie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurel K. Leslie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurel K. Leslie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurel K. Leslie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurel K. Leslie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurel K. Leslie. The network helps show where Laurel K. Leslie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laurel K. Leslie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 9 | Exploring the Integration of Systems and Social Sciences to Study Evidence Use among Child Welfare Policy-Makers | 2015 | 8 |
| 10 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 20 | Can pediatric training manage in managed care? | 1995 | 16 |
About Laurel K. Leslie
Laurel K. Leslie is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 193 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (55 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (50 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (39 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (39 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (28 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (27 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (23 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (2.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.4k citations) and General Health Professions (2.6k citations). Laurel K. Leslie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include John Landsverk, Michael S. Hurlburt, Donald J. Slymen, Jinjin Zhang, Richard P. Barth, Sigrid James, John B. Wong, Angie Mae Rodday, Amy R. Monn and Gregory A. Aarons. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Circulation and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.