Analytic Philosophy

290 papers and 1.8k indexed citations

About

The 290 papers published in Analytic Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Analytic Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (231 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (194 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (83 papers) specifically the topics of Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (188 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (187 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Analytic Philosophy are Elisabeth Camp, Gideon Rosen, Robin Jeshion, Daniel Whiting, Amie L. Thomasson, Sarah‐Jane Leslie, John Morrison, Selim Berker, Ian Phillips and Luvell Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Analytic Philosophy

223 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Analytic Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Analytic Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Analytic Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Analytic Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Analytic Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Analytic Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analytic Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026