Annalisa Coliva
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Maria BaghramianDanièle Moyal‐SharrockNikolaj Jang Lee Linding PedersenDuncan PritchardSebastiano MoruzziBéatrice LonguenesseJohn CampbellChristopher Peacocke
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (38 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (32 papers)Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of PhilosophyNeuroendocrinology
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Annalisa Coliva
68 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Philosophy 566
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 355
- Cognitive Neuroscience 160
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- History and Philosophy of Science 66
Countries citing papers authored by Annalisa Coliva
This map shows the geographic impact of Annalisa Coliva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annalisa Coliva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annalisa Coliva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annalisa Coliva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annalisa Coliva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annalisa Coliva. The network helps show where Annalisa Coliva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annalisa Coliva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annalisa Coliva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annalisa Coliva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annalisa Coliva. Annalisa Coliva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Filosofia analitica. Temi e problemi | 1 |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Annalisa Coliva
Annalisa Coliva is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Arts and Humanities, having authored 81 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (38 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (32 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (566 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (355 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (66 citations). Annalisa Coliva has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Maria Baghramian, Danièle Moyal‐Sharrock, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen, Duncan Pritchard, Sebastiano Moruzzi, Béatrice Longuenesse, John Campbell, Christopher Peacocke, Jenann Ismael and Simon Prosser. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Philosophy and Neuroendocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.