Max Deutsch
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in ⓘ
- Philosophy 14
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 11
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 10
- Co-authors
- Michael K. Johnson (1 shared paper)Herman Cappelen (1 shared paper)Mark Rowlands (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Inquiry (4 papers)Synthese (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Review of Philosophy and Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongMongoliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Max Deutsch
18 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Philosophy 293
- History and Philosophy of Science 60
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
- Cognitive Neuroscience 214
- General Decision Sciences 8
Countries citing papers authored by Max Deutsch
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Deutsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Deutsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Deutsch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max Deutsch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Deutsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Deutsch. The network helps show where Max Deutsch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Max Deutsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 5 | The Myth of the Intuitive: Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method | 2015 | 24 |
| 6 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 8 | The use of contingent music to increase appropriate conversational speech. | 1978 | 9 |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 15 | The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy | 2018 | 1 |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 19 | Externalism About the Mind | 2020 | 0 |
About Max Deutsch
Max Deutsch is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (293 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (60 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations) and General Decision Sciences (8 citations). Max Deutsch has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Mongolia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael K. Johnson, Herman Cappelen and Mark Rowlands. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Analysis and Review of Philosophy and Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.