Debra Ferreday

644 citations
31 papers · 343 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Debra Ferreday

26 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Debra Ferreday
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Gender Studies 116
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 21
  • Communication 54
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 48
Replace Pål Aarsand with:
Pål Aarsand Norway
Victoria Carrington Australia
Ryan A. Miller United States
David Poveda Spain
Ebony Elizabeth Thomas United States
Marilyn Martin‐Jones United Kingdom
David Trend United States
Mitzi Lewison United States
Darío Luis Banegas United Kingdom
Diane Hui Hong Kong
Debra Ferreday relative to Pål Aarsand Norway Pål Aarsand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Pål Aarsand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Ferreday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Ferreday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Ferreday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Ferreday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Ferreday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Ferreday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Ferreday. The network helps show where Debra Ferreday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Debra Ferreday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Ferreday Line = papers co-authored together Debra Ferreday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200868
2 200338
3 201532
4 200829
5 200627
6 201021
7
The tyranny of participation and collaborating in networked learning
200819
8 200917
9
Online Belongings: Fantasy, Affect and Web Communities
200912
10 200812
11
Computer Cross-Dressing:Queering the Virtual Subject
200710
12 20116
13 20176
14 20126
15 20075
16
Haunted bodies: visual cultures of anorexia and size zero
20115
17 20175
18 20204
19
Heterotopia in Networked Learning: Beyond the Shadow Side of Participation in Learning Communities
20104
20 20104

About Debra Ferreday

Debra Ferreday is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Museology, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (14 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (116 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (21 citations), Communication (54 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (48 citations). Debra Ferreday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vivien Hodgson, Chris Jones, Rebecca Coleman, Simon J. Lock, Imogen Tyler and Adi Kuntsman. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Theory, Feminist Media Studies, Celebrity Studies, Journal for Cultural Research and International Journal of Cultural Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact