Feminist Media Studies

1.8k papers and 21.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.8k papers published in Feminist Media Studies in the last decades have received a total of 21.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Feminist Media Studies usually cover Gender Studies (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (688 papers) and Communication (405 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Feminism, and Media (1.1k papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (275 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (260 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Feminist Media Studies are Ángela McRobbie, Rosalind Gill, Rosemary Clark, Imogen Tyler, Hester Baer, Emma A. Jane, Moya Bailey, Sarah Banet‐Weiser, Jane Arthurs and Michelle Flood.

In The Last Decade

Feminist Media Studies

1.5k papers receiving 18.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Feminist Media Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Feminist Media Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Feminist Media Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feminist Media Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Feminist Media Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Feminist Media Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Feminist Media Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026