Deborah Oxley
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
- History top 1%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 20
- Co-authors
- Sara HorrellStephen NicholasDavid MeredithPatricia GrimshawMarjorie TheobaldJohn J. KepesHamish Maxwell‐StewartJim Stankovich
- Journals
- The Economic History Review (9 papers)Labour History (4 papers)Social Science History (2 papers)Australian Economic History Review (2 papers)Australian Historical Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaSweden
In The Last Decade
Deborah Oxley
31 papers receiving 500 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Economics and Econometrics 350
- History 125
- Gender Studies 103
- History and Philosophy of Science 34
- Sociology and Political Science 208
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Oxley
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Oxley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Oxley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Oxley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Oxley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Oxley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Oxley. The network helps show where Deborah Oxley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Oxley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 6 | Anthropometric measures of living standards and gender inequality in nineteenth-century Britain. | 2007 | 2 |
| 7 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 9 | Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Review of the Research Evidence, The | 2004 | 4 |
| 10 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 51 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 52 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 56 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1965 | 26 |
About Deborah Oxley
Deborah Oxley is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Economics and Econometrics, History, Gender Studies and Anthropology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (20 papers), Australian History and Society (9 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (7 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (3 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (350 citations), History (125 citations), Gender Studies (103 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (34 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (208 citations). Deborah Oxley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Sara Horrell, Stephen Nicholas, David Meredith, Patricia Grimshaw, Marjorie Theobald, John J. Kepes, Hamish Maxwell‐Stewart, Jim Stankovich, Kris Inwood and Robin Haines. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, Labour History, Social Science History, Australian Economic History Review and Australian Historical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.