David Meredith

94 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

David Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Anthropology 178
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94
  • Plant Science 202
  • Economics and Econometrics 99
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 2
Replace Patrick M. Manning with:
Patrick M. Manning United States
Ian Cook United Kingdom
Francesca Bray United Kingdom
Craig Young United Kingdom
Thomas R. De Gregori United States
Jenny Cameron Australia
Tim Unwin United Kingdom
John Fairweather New Zealand
STEPHEN F. GUDEMAN United States
Philip Crang United Kingdom
David Meredith relative to Patrick M. Manning United States Patrick M. Manning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Patrick M. Manning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Meredith. The network helps show where David Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Meredith Line = papers co-authored together David Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011173
2 199494
3 201082
4 201275
5 201173
6 195271
7 200770
8 200661
9 201348
10 200847
11 201245
12 201141
13 197538
14
Global Connections: A History of Exports and the Australian Economy
199737
15 202137
16 199135
17 199735
18 200535
19 202130
20 198428

About David Meredith

David Meredith is a scholar working on Archeology, Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Anthropology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture and Farm Safety (23 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (9 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (3 papers), Rural development and sustainability (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (178 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (94 citations), Plant Science (202 citations), Economics and Econometrics (99 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (2 citations). David Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John G. McNamara, Deborah Oxley, Catherine M. Blake, Aoife Osborne, Caitríona Cunningham, Michael Havinden, James Phelan, Bróna M. Fullen, Peter Cain and Noel Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, Sociologia Ruralis, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology and American Journal of Industrial Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact