The Economic History Review

8.3k papers and 99.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.3k papers published in The Economic History Review in the last decades have received a total of 99.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Economic History Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (2.5k papers), History (1.2k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (2.1k papers), Australian History and Society (319 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (312 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Economic History Review are I. M. D. Little, W. W. Rostow, Nicholas Crafts, Sidney Pollard, Robert C. Allen, A. W. Coats, Jan Luiten van Zanden, Sheilagh Ogilvie, Avner Offer and F. M. L. Thompson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Economic History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Economic History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Economic History Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Economic History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Economic History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Economic History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Economic History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025