Annabel Gregory
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
- History top 5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 8
-
- Historical and modern epidemiology studies 2
- Co-authors
- Roderick Floud (11 shared papers)Kenneth W. Wachter (11 shared papers)Richard H. Steckel (1 shared paper)Nickolas J. Themelis (1 shared paper)Timothy B. Gage (1 shared paper)David Eltis (1 shared paper)William H. Dietz (1 shared paper)Nicholas Crafts (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Economic History Review (5 papers)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)Journal of Public Health Policy (1 paper)Population and Development Review (1 paper)Labour / Le Travail (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Annabel Gregory
12 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Economics and Econometrics 180
- History 51
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 65
- Gender Studies 28
- Health 23
Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Gregory
This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Gregory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Gregory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Gregory. The network helps show where Annabel Gregory may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Annabel Gregory, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 228 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 1 |
About Annabel Gregory
Annabel Gregory is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers), Historical and modern epidemiology studies (2 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (1 paper), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (1 paper) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (180 citations), History (51 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (65 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations) and Health (23 citations). Annabel Gregory has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roderick Floud, Kenneth W. Wachter, Richard H. Steckel, Nickolas J. Themelis, Timothy B. Gage, David Eltis, William H. Dietz and Nicholas Crafts. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Public Health Policy, Population and Development Review and Labour / Le Travail.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.