Australian Historical Studies

1.1k papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Australian Historical Studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Historical Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (648 papers), Anthropology (198 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (161 papers) specifically the topics of Australian History and Society (513 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (80 papers) and World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Historical Studies are Marilyn Lake, Graeme Davison, Russell McGregor, Richard Broome, Alison Bashford, Andrew Fitzmaurice, Lorenzo Veracini, Shino Konishi, Neville Meaney and Mark Finnane.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Historical Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Historical Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Historical Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Historical Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Historical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Historical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Historical Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025