Labour History

1.8k papers and 16.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Labour History in the last decades have received a total of 16.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Labour History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers), Public Administration (314 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (249 papers) specifically the topics of Australian History and Society (798 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (313 papers) and Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Labour History are Mark Hearn, Michel Foucault, Andrew Markus, Humphrey McQueen, E. P. Thompson, Ray Markey, Robert Tierney, Ching Kwan Lee, Cynthia Cockburn and Eric Fry.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Labour History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Labour History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Labour History.

Countries where authors publish in Labour History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Labour History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Labour History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Labour History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025