Deborah Fulmer

412 total citations
8 papers, 278 citations indexed

About

Deborah Fulmer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Fulmer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 278 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Deborah Fulmer's work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). Deborah Fulmer is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). Deborah Fulmer collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Deborah Fulmer's co-authors include Rollanda E. O’Connor, Kathryn M. Bell, Naomi Zigmond, Christopher J. Lemons, Cynthia S. Puranik, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Seth King, Deborah J. Fidler, Kimberly A. Davidson and Amanda Kloo and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Learning Disabilities, Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities and Intellectual and developmental disabilities.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Fulmer

8 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Deborah Fulmer United States	5	229	116	77	50	39	8	278
Danielle Parisi United States	5	160 0.7×	125 1.1×	31 0.4×	67 1.3×	62 1.6×	6	291
Stephanie Morano United States	11	170 0.7×	185 1.6×	111 1.4×	75 1.5×	63 1.6×	30	328
Kathryn E. Jaspers United States	7	127 0.6×	99 0.9×	71 0.9×	29 0.6×	12 0.3×	12	226
Gaye McNutt United States	9	208 0.9×	158 1.4×	73 0.9×	57 1.1×	83 2.1×	15	360
Melissa N. Andersen United States	8	133 0.6×	64 0.6×	43 0.6×	89 1.8×	57 1.5×	14	261
Jennifer P. Cheatham United States	8	247 1.1×	102 0.9×	64 0.8×	23 0.5×	89 2.3×	9	295
Christina Yeager Pelatti United States	9	220 1.0×	361 3.1×	57 0.7×	39 0.8×	16 0.4×	15	425
David F. Bateman United States	10	114 0.5×	115 1.0×	26 0.3×	82 1.6×	94 2.4×	27	277
Rhonda Faragher Australia	11	46 0.2×	152 1.3×	67 0.9×	61 1.2×	52 1.3×	35	262
Peggy J. Schaefer Whitby United States	9	117 0.5×	129 1.1×	64 0.8×	140 2.8×	39 1.0×	15	318

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Fulmer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Fulmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Fulmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Fulmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Fulmer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Fulmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Fulmer. The network helps show where Deborah Fulmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Fulmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Fulmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Fulmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Fulmer. Deborah Fulmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

King, Seth, et al.. (2020). Reading Instruction for Children with down Syndrome: Extending Research on Behavioral Phenotype Aligned Interventions. Exceptionality. 30(2). 92–108. 4 indexed citations

Lemons, Christopher J., Seth King, Kimberly A. Davidson, et al.. (2015). Adapting Phonological Awareness Interventions for Children With Down Syndrome Based on the Behavioral Phenotype: A Promising Approach?. Intellectual and developmental disabilities. 53(4). 271–288. 32 indexed citations

Lemons, Christopher J., Seth King, Kimberly A. Davidson, et al.. (2015). Developing an Early Reading Intervention Aligned With the Down Syndrome Behavioral Phenotype. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 32(3). 176–187. 27 indexed citations

Lemons, Christopher J., et al.. (2012). Implementing an Alternate Assessment based on Modified Academic Achievement Standards: When policy meets practice. International Journal of Disability Development and Education. 59(1). 67–79. 4 indexed citations

O’Connor, Rollanda E., et al.. (2005). Tiers of Intervention in Kindergarten Through Third Grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 38(6). 532–538. 103 indexed citations

O’Connor, Rollanda E., et al.. (2005). Layers of Reading Intervention in Kindergarten Through Third Grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 38(5). 440–455. 85 indexed citations

Fulmer, Deborah, et al.. (2001). School: The Normalizing Factor for Children With Childhood Leukemia; Perspectives of Young Survivors and Their Parents. Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 46(1). 4–13. 21 indexed citations

O’Connor, Rollanda E., et al.. (2001). Total Awareness: Reducing the Severity of Reading Disability.. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact