Deanna M. Lyter

963 citations
6 papers · 364 indexed · h-index 5

Deanna M. Lyter

6 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Deanna M. Lyter
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Education 301
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37
  • Music 12
  • Safety Research 24
  • Social Psychology 41
Replace Joan Barnatt with:
Joan Barnatt United States
M. Arthur Garmon United States
Nancy K. Freeman United States
Desiree Carver-Thomas United States
Nedra A. Crow United States
Wendy Hastings Australia
Lisa Scherff United States
Karen Shakman United States
Dianna Gahlsdorf Terrell United States
Rebecca Goldring
Deanna M. Lyter relative to Joan Barnatt United States Joan Barnatt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joan Barnatt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deanna M. Lyter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deanna M. Lyter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deanna M. Lyter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deanna M. Lyter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deanna M. Lyter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deanna M. Lyter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deanna M. Lyter. The network helps show where Deanna M. Lyter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Deanna M. Lyter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deanna M. Lyter Line = papers co-authored together Deanna M. Lyter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Documentation for the 2008-09 Teacher Follow-up Survey. NCES 2011-304.
20119
2
Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the 2004-05 Teacher Follow-Up Survey. NCES 2007-307.
2007170
3
Characteristics of Schools, Districts, Teachers, Principals, and School Libraries in the United States: 2003-04 Schools and Staffing Survey. E.D. TAB. NCES 2006-313 Revised.
200680
4
Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey, 2000-01. E.D. Tabs. NCES 2004-301.
200459
5 200343
6
Consumer health care finances and education: matters of values.
20023

About Deanna M. Lyter

Deanna M. Lyter is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 6 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (2 papers), Education Systems and Policy (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (1 paper), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (1 paper), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (1 paper), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper) and Global Health Care Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (301 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (37 citations) and Music (12 citations). Deanna M. Lyter has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory A. Strizek, Pia Peltola, John D. Marvel, Erin E. Fox, Kate Riordan, Kerry J. Gruber, Esther Ngan‐ling Chow and Joshua Joseph. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching Sociology, PubMed and National Center for Education Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026