Deanna M. Lyter
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Gregory A. StrizekPia PeltolaJohn D. MarvelErin E. FoxKate RiordanKerry J. GruberEsther Ngan‐ling ChowJoshua Joseph
- Topics
- School Choice and Performance (2 papers)Education Systems and Policy (2 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper)
- Journals
- Teaching SociologyPubMedNational Center for Education Statistics
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Deanna M. Lyter
6 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Education 301
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Social Psychology 41
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37
- Clinical Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Deanna M. Lyter
This map shows the geographic impact of Deanna M. Lyter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deanna M. Lyter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deanna M. Lyter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deanna M. Lyter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deanna M. Lyter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deanna M. Lyter. The network helps show where Deanna M. Lyter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deanna M. Lyter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deanna M. Lyter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deanna M. Lyter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deanna M. Lyter. Deanna M. Lyter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Documentation for the 2008-09 Teacher Follow-up Survey. NCES 2011-304. | 9 |
| 2 | Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the 2004-05 Teacher Follow-Up Survey. NCES 2007-307. | 170 |
| 3 | Characteristics of Schools, Districts, Teachers, Principals, and School Libraries in the United States: 2003-04 Schools and Staffing Survey. E.D. TAB. NCES 2006-313 Revised. | 80 |
| 4 | Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey, 2000-01. E.D. Tabs. NCES 2004-301. | 59 |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | Consumer health care finances and education: matters of values. | 3 |
About Deanna M. Lyter
Deanna M. Lyter is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 6 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (2 papers), Education Systems and Policy (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (301 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (37 citations) and Music (12 citations). Deanna M. Lyter has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory A. Strizek, Pia Peltola, John D. Marvel, Erin E. Fox, Kate Riordan, Kerry J. Gruber, Esther Ngan‐ling Chow and Joshua Joseph. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching Sociology, PubMed and National Center for Education Statistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.