David Jones
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Craig LambertHugh LavertyDennis A. SmithStephen E. ClarkeJ. Gerry KennaNico VermeulenSidney D. NelsonC. Smith
- Topics
- Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers)Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (3 papers)Engineering Education and Pedagogy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
David Jones
58 papers receiving 718 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Molecular Biology 164
- Pharmacology 160
- Education 90
- Organic Chemistry 79
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 73
Countries citing papers authored by David Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of David Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Jones. The network helps show where David Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Jones. David Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Managing the challenge of chemically reactive metabolites in drug developmentbreakdown → | 338 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | A Framework for Life-Cycle Cost Analyses and Environmental Life-Cycle Assessments for Permeable Pavements | 6 |
| 13 | Learning networks: Harnessing the power of online communities for discipline and lifelong learning | 2 |
| 14 | A Research Brief: A Novel Characteristic of Role Model Choice by Black Male College Students. | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Credit transfer and the internationalisation of distance education | 2 |
| 17 | The 'Waterfall' Botanic Garden on Pulau Pinang : the foundations of the Penang Botanic Gardens 1884-1910 | 1 |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About David Jones
David Jones is a scholar working on Architecture, Medical Laboratory Technology and Small Animals, having authored 66 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (3 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (160 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (73 citations) and Toxicology (11 citations). David Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Craig Lambert, Hugh Laverty, Dennis A. Smith, Stephen E. Clarke, J. Gerry Kenna, Nico Vermeulen, Sidney D. Nelson, C. Smith, Dean J. Naisbitt and Christopher E. Goldring. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.