David Bolden
- Education top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Tony HarriesDouglas P. NewtonPatrick BarmbyPeter TymmsLynn D. NewtonChristine MerrellElena L. GrigorenkoMei Tan
- Topics
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers)Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers)Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyStatistics and Probability
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChild DevelopmentBMJ Open
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
David Bolden
19 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Education 148
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 75
- Statistics and Probability 47
- Cognitive Neuroscience 37
Countries citing papers authored by David Bolden
This map shows the geographic impact of David Bolden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bolden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bolden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Bolden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bolden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bolden. The network helps show where David Bolden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Bolden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Bolden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Bolden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Bolden. David Bolden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 101 | |
| 17 | Science in English primary schools : trends in attainment, attitudes and approaches. | 8 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About David Bolden
David Bolden is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 20 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (75 citations) and Statistics and Probability (47 citations). David Bolden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Tony Harries, Douglas P. Newton, Patrick Barmby, Peter Tymms, Lynn D. Newton, Christine Merrell, Elena L. Grigorenko, Mei Tan, Catalina Mourgues and Sarah Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.