Daniel Lorenzo
- Food Science top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Eduardo DellacassaEduardo CasselCaren D. FrizzoNatalia MartínezRubem Mário Figueiró VargasPhilip DaviesRoser VilaSalvador Cañigueral
- Topics
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (33 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (17 papers)Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (13 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
In The Last Decade
Daniel Lorenzo
43 papers receiving 902 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Food Science 593
- Plant Science 516
- Molecular Biology 273
- Biochemistry 104
- Cancer Research 81
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lorenzo
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lorenzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lorenzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lorenzo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lorenzo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lorenzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lorenzo. The network helps show where Daniel Lorenzo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Lorenzo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Lorenzo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Lorenzo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Lorenzo. Daniel Lorenzo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | Multivariate analysis discrimination of various cold-pressed lemon oils from different geographical regions | 14 |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 107 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Daniel Lorenzo
Daniel Lorenzo is a scholar working on Food Science, Biochemistry and Plant Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (33 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (17 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (593 citations), Biochemistry (104 citations) and Plant Science (516 citations). Daniel Lorenzo has collaborated with scholars based in Uruguay, Italy and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo Dellacassa, Eduardo Cassel, Caren D. Frizzo, Natalia Martínez, Rubem Mário Figueiró Vargas, Philip Davies, Roser Vila, Salvador Cañigueral, Patrick Moyna and Luigi Mondello. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.