David Tena
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Fault Detection and Control Systems 4
- Advanced Control Systems Optimization 2
-
- Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna 2
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Fernando Valladares (4 shared papers)Silvia Matesanz (3 shared papers)Ülo Niinemets (1 shared paper)Mari Tobias (1 shared paper)Angelika Portsmuth (1 shared paper)Ismael Aranda (1 shared paper)Francisco Suárez (1 shared paper)Daniel Lorenzo (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
David Tena
7 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 228
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 133
- Plant Science 211
- Global and Planetary Change 118
- Ecological Modeling 20
Countries citing papers authored by David Tena
This map shows the geographic impact of David Tena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Tena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Tena more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Tena
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Tena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Tena. The network helps show where David Tena may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside David Tena, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 199 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 8 | Implicaciones funcionales y evolutivas de la estructura y dinámica de las comunidades herbáceas de bordes de carretera | 2006 | 1 |
| 9 | 2018 | 0 |
About David Tena
David Tena is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Ecological Modeling, having authored 9 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fault Detection and Control Systems (4 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper), Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies (1 paper) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (228 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (133 citations), Plant Science (211 citations), Global and Planetary Change (118 citations) and Ecological Modeling (20 citations). David Tena has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Estonia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Fernando Valladares, Silvia Matesanz, Ülo Niinemets, Mari Tobias, Angelika Portsmuth, Ismael Aranda, Francisco Suárez, Daniel Lorenzo, J. A. Pardos and David Sánchez‐Gómez. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Journal of Vegetation Science, Annals of Botany, Control Engineering Practice and Tree Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.