Daniel Hind
- Emergency Medical Services top 0.2%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
-
- Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances 10
- Internal Medicine top 5%
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 18
-
- Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes 15
- Diverticular Disease and Complications 8
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 12
-
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease 11
-
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 9
-
- Delphi Technique in Research 9
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. WaltersPeter CoventryPaul TappendenCindy CooperA HutchinsonMike BradburnSue WardChristopher Carroll
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Hind
142 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Emergency Medical Services 663
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 290
- Applied Psychology 180
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.1k
- Internal Medicine 114
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hind
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hind more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hind
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hind. The network helps show where Daniel Hind may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 17 | Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysisbreakdown → | 2021 | 314 |
| 18 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 20 | Does intensive follow-up of lung cancer patients improve survival?: a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2009 | 1 |
About Daniel Hind
Daniel Hind is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions and Family Practice, having authored 155 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (15 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (11 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (10 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (9 papers) and Diverticular Disease and Complications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (663 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (290 citations) and Applied Psychology (180 citations). Daniel Hind has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Walters, Peter Coventry, Paul Tappenden, Cindy Cooper, A Hutchinson, Mike Bradburn, Sue Ward, Christopher Carroll, Steven R. Brown and Lynda Wyld. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Trials, Colorectal Disease, PLoS ONE and Techniques in Coloproctology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.