Ines Rombach

4.1k citations
53 papers · 1.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 18

Ines Rombach

52 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with physiotherapy and ...179201920262021202350100150

Peers

Ines Rombach
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 243
  • Surgery 768
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 105
  • Rheumatology 128
  • Statistics and Probability 54
Replace J Ohn with:
J Ohn
Susan M. Joy United States
Khalid Benkhadra United States
Dianne Jackowski Canada
Rover Krips Netherlands
D. van der Heijde Netherlands
Ki Hyuk Sung South Korea
Mustafa Şenocak Türkiye
Féline P B Kroon Netherlands
Sharon Griffin Canada
Ines Rombach relative to J Ohn J Ohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J Ohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Rombach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Rombach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Rombach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Rombach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Rombach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Rombach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Rombach. The network helps show where Ines Rombach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Rombach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Rombach Line = papers co-authored together Ines Rombach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20242
3 20241
4 20241
5 20243
6 20224
7 20222
8 20221
9 202232
10 20218
11 20211
12 20212
13 202016
14
How well are binary outcomes analysed and the findings reported? - A systematic review of randomised trials
20191
15
Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with physiotherapy and activity modification for the treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: multicentre randomised controlled trialbreakdown →
2019179
16 201810
17 201639
18 201638
19 201531
20 201535

About Ines Rombach

Ines Rombach is a scholar working on Anatomy, Transplantation, Surgery, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Rheumatology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (10 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (7 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (4 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (243 citations), Surgery (768 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (105 citations), Rheumatology (128 citations) and Statistics and Probability (54 citations). Ines Rombach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Carr, Benjamin Dean, David Beard, Andrew Judge, Alastair Gray, Mark E. Morrey, Gary S. Collins, Emilie Lostis, Sally Hopewell and Crispin Jenkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, BMJ Open, Lara D. Veeken, The Bone & Joint Journal and BMJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026