Kinta Beaver

80 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Kinta Beaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • General Health Professions 1.6k
  • Oncology 1.4k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 540
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 374
Replace Sanchia Aranda with:
Sanchia Aranda Australia
Fitzhugh Mullan United States
Valerie Fiset Canada
Krystina B. Lewis Canada
David R. Rovner United States
Megan Johnson Shen United States
Jessica Corner United Kingdom
Melina Gattellari Australia
Jamie Bryant Australia
Anne McMurray Australia
Kinta Beaver relative to Sanchia Aranda Australia Sanchia Aranda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sanchia Aranda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kinta Beaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kinta Beaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kinta Beaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kinta Beaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kinta Beaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kinta Beaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kinta Beaver. The network helps show where Kinta Beaver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kinta Beaver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kinta Beaver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kinta Beaver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kinta Beaver. Kinta Beaver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 12
2 11
3 22
4 43
5 14
6 21
7
Health care professionals views' of the follow-up of lung cancer patients
1
8 67
9 93
10
Does intensive follow-up of lung cancer patients improve survival?: a systematic review and meta-analysis
1
11 151
12 26
13 25
14 67
15 69
16
A cross-sectional survey of priority information needs in adult asthma patients
1
17 43
18
The views of terminally ill people and lay carers on primary care.
1
19 110
20
The Information Needs Of Women With Breast Cancer: A Follow-Up Study
31

About Kinta Beaver

Kinta Beaver is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 80 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (25 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (25 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.6k citations), Oncology (1.4k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations). Kinta Beaver has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Luker, Susan Williamson, R. Glynn Owens, Sam Leinster, Lesley F. Degner, Jeffrey A. Sloan, S. Susnerwala, Gary Witham, Katie Booth and Simon Woods. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, British journal of surgery and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026