M Lloyd-Jones

1.8k citations
18 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

M Lloyd-Jones

17 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

M Lloyd-Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 147
  • General Health Professions 304
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Clinical Psychology 199
  • Health 78
Replace Gudrun Rohde with:
Gudrun Rohde Norway
Caroline Mitchell United Kingdom
Barbro Arvidsson Sweden
Leida M. Lamers Netherlands
Joyce Nyhof‐Young Canada
T. Joseph Sheehan United States
Cicely Kerr United Kingdom
Leslie Holland United States
Jürgen Kasper Germany
Karen G. Schepp United States
M Lloyd-Jones relative to Gudrun Rohde Norway Gudrun Rohde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Gudrun Rohde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Lloyd-Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Lloyd-Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Lloyd-Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Lloyd-Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Lloyd-Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Lloyd-Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Lloyd-Jones. The network helps show where M Lloyd-Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Lloyd-Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Lloyd-Jones Line = papers co-authored together M Lloyd-Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20136
2 201256
3 2012269
4 2012221
5 2012196
6 201247
7
Diagnostic venepuncture: systematic review of adverse events
20121
8 201131
9 201165
10 20117
11
Does intensive follow-up of lung cancer patients improve survival?: a systematic review and meta-analysis
20091
12 200957
13 200972
14 200760
15 2007104
16 20070
17 200423
18 19697

About M Lloyd-Jones

M Lloyd-Jones is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper) and Bone Metabolism and Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (147 citations), General Health Professions (304 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations), Clinical Psychology (199 citations) and Health (78 citations). M Lloyd-Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matt Stevenson, Christopher Carroll, Ryan H. Y. Wong, Andrew Booth, John Brazier, Alicia O’Cathain, Suzy Paisley, Janice Connell, Sarah Davis and Diana Papaioannou. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, International Nursing Review, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Surgical Endoscopy and Qualitative Health Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026