Techniques in Coloproctology

2.4k papers and 32.9k indexed citations

About

The 2.4k papers published in Techniques in Coloproctology in the last decades have received a total of 32.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Techniques in Coloproctology usually cover Surgery (2.0k papers), Oncology (1.3k papers) and Rheumatology (695 papers) specifically the topics of Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1.2k papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (1.0k papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (661 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Techniques in Coloproctology are S. Atallah, Mario Pescatori, Steven D. Wexner, Y. H. Ho, A Wilhelm, G. Gagliardi, Piercarlo Meinero, Sergio W. Larach, Jonathan N. Lund and Lorenzo Mori.

In The Last Decade

Techniques in Coloproctology

2.2k papers receiving 31.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Techniques in Coloproctology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Techniques in Coloproctology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Techniques in Coloproctology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Techniques in Coloproctology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Techniques in Coloproctology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Techniques in Coloproctology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Techniques in Coloproctology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026