Elena Sheldon
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 2
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 1
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel Hind (5 shared papers)Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley (2 shared papers)Natalie Chan (1 shared paper)Michael Barkham (1 shared paper)Claire Bone (1 shared paper)Alex Kenny (1 shared paper)Scott Weich (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Taylor Buck (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Expectations (3 papers)BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)Journal of Affective Disorders (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Elena Sheldon
5 papers receiving 325 citations
Elena Sheldon's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 201
- Applied Psychology 46
- Social Psychology 115
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- General Health Professions 102
Countries citing papers authored by Elena Sheldon
This map shows the geographic impact of Elena Sheldon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena Sheldon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena Sheldon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elena Sheldon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena Sheldon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena Sheldon. The network helps show where Elena Sheldon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Elena Sheldon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 314 |
| 2 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 |
About Elena Sheldon
Elena Sheldon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (201 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations), Social Psychology (115 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations) and General Health Professions (102 citations). Elena Sheldon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Hind, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Natalie Chan, Michael Barkham, Claire Bone, Alex Kenny, Scott Weich, Elizabeth Taylor Buck, Alan Lobo and Kerry H. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Health Expectations, BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Affective Disorders and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.