Dana L. Kendall
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Co-authors
- Eduardo SalasC. Shawn BurkeLinda G. PierceKevin C. StaglPaul Y. KimMarcia WebbElizabeth ChangShannon Scielzo
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers)Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers)Mentoring and Academic Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PsychologyJournal of Counseling PsychologyAmerican Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dana L. Kendall
13 papers receiving 682 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Social Psychology 441
- Sociology and Political Science 163
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 154
- Clinical Psychology 123
- Communication 117
Countries citing papers authored by Dana L. Kendall
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana L. Kendall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana L. Kendall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana L. Kendall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana L. Kendall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana L. Kendall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana L. Kendall. The network helps show where Dana L. Kendall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana L. Kendall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana L. Kendall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana L. Kendall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana L. Kendall. Dana L. Kendall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Does Choice Matter? The Impact Of Allowing Proteges To Select Their Own Mentors | 1 |
| 14 | Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model.breakdown → | 545 |
About Dana L. Kendall
Dana L. Kendall is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (441 citations), Communication (117 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (154 citations). Dana L. Kendall has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo Salas, C. Shawn Burke, Linda G. Pierce, Kevin C. Stagl, Paul Y. Kim, Marcia Webb, Elizabeth Chang, Shannon Scielzo, Keyne C. Law and Kimberly A. Smith‐Jentsch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.