C.W. Elston

5.8k citations
89 papers · 4.0k indexed · h-index 34

C.W. Elston

85 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

C.W. Elston
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Cancer Research 2.1k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.7k
  • Dermatology 577
  • Oncology 1.7k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 497
Replace Gordon F. Schwartz with:
Gordon F. Schwartz United States
R.W. Blamey United Kingdom
R.W. Blamey United Kingdom
Anthony Douglas-Jones United Kingdom
Jennet Harvey Australia
Lowell W. Rogers United States
Shahla Masood United States
Sakari Toikkanen Finland
R. Douglas Macmillan United Kingdom
Nora Hansen United States
C.W. Elston relative to Gordon F. Schwartz United States Gordon F. Schwartz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gordon F. Schwartz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Elston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Elston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Elston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Elston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Elston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Elston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Elston. The network helps show where C.W. Elston may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.W. Elston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.W. Elston Line = papers co-authored together C.W. Elston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200862
2 2007103
3 2005109
4 200380
5 199650
6 199630
7 19952
8 199442
9 199484
10 1993124
11
Surgery versus tamoxifen in selected elderly patients with operable breast cancer Early results of a randomised trial
19921
12
An evaluation of differences in prognosis, recurrence patterns and receptor status between invasive lobular and other invasive carcinomas of the breast.
199189
13
The value of histological grade in breast cancer experience from a large study with a long term follow up
199116
14 199155
15 199126
16 198823
17 19887
18 198562
19 1982154
20
Estrogen receptor assay in primary breast cancer and early recurrence of the disease.
1978114

About C.W. Elston

C.W. Elston is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (45 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (29 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (13 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (13 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (10 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (8 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (2.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.7k citations) and Dermatology (577 citations). C.W. Elston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, R.W. Blamey, R.W. Blamey, A P Locker, Sarah E. Pinder, J. L. Haybittle, M Galea, A H S Lee, K. Griffiths and Joshua A. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Radiology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026