C.W. Elston
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Oncology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Dermatology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Ian O. EllisR.W. BlameyA P LockerSarah E. PinderJ. L. HaybittleM GaleaA H S LeeK. Griffiths
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (45 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (29 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
C.W. Elston
85 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Cancer Research 2.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.7k
- Oncology 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 632
- Dermatology 577
Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Elston
This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Elston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Elston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Elston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Elston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Elston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Elston. The network helps show where C.W. Elston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.W. Elston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.W. Elston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.W. Elston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.W. Elston. C.W. Elston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62 | |
| 2 | 103 | |
| 3 | 109 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 84 | |
| 10 | 124 | |
| 11 | Surgery versus tamoxifen in selected elderly patients with operable breast cancer Early results of a randomised trial | 1 |
| 12 | An evaluation of differences in prognosis, recurrence patterns and receptor status between invasive lobular and other invasive carcinomas of the breast. | 89 |
| 13 | The value of histological grade in breast cancer experience from a large study with a long term follow up | 16 |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 154 | |
| 20 | Estrogen receptor assay in primary breast cancer and early recurrence of the disease. | 114 |
About C.W. Elston
C.W. Elston is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (45 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (29 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (2.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.7k citations) and Dermatology (577 citations). C.W. Elston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, R.W. Blamey, R.W. Blamey, A P Locker, Sarah E. Pinder, J. L. Haybittle, M Galea, A H S Lee, K. Griffiths and Joshua A. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Radiology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.